this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
79 points (94.4% liked)

memes

23597 readers
379 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
WhyEssEff@hexbear.net
ella@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
Wakmrow@hexbear.net
RedWizard@hexbear.net
79
if political compass was a meme (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Diva@lemmy.ml to c/memes@hexbear.net
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

hot off the presses monkey-typewriter

Was getting sick of the endless political horseshoe/fishhook/stethoscope left punching memes, so I made this for !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com, crossposting here since most of the emojis are lifted from here

Feel free to roast me or suggest shit to add

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair enough, I was basically just commenting because you invited feedback, though I'm sure you know that.

I think even that is being too nice to Tito, but I'll be more concerned if we get a Titoist contingent on the board.

Incidentally, I know she criticized the Bolsheviks quite severely in several respects, but did Luxemburg deny the need for a vanguard party altogether? I haven't read what she has to say on that.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

but did Luxemburg deny the need for a vanguard party altogether

from my understanding she was opposed to that type of centralization, from the organizational questions of the Russian social democracy:

Granting, as Lenin wants, such absolute powers of a negative character to the top organ of the party, we strengthen, to a dangerous extent, the conservatism inherent in such an organ. If the tactics of the socialist party are not to be the creation of a Central Committee but of the whole party, or, still better, of the whole labor movement, then it is clear that the party sections and federations need the liberty of action which alone will permit them to develop their revolutionary initiative and to utilize all the resources of the situation. The ultra-centralism asked by Lenin is full of the sterile spirit of the overseer. It is not a positive and creative spirit. Lenin’s concern is not so much to make the activity of the party more fruitful as to control the party – to narrow the movement rather than to develop it, to bind rather than to unify it.

she also talked about it in "The Russian Revolution" after they took power, chapter 5 + 6 were the relevant sections in that

Fair enough, I was basically just commenting because you invited feedback, though I’m sure you know that.

no worries, it's welcome!