this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
108 points (88.0% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

2052 readers
4 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in unrelated arguments.

Brigading — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from voting, commenting or manipulating the post in any way, this includes alt accounts. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be permanently banned.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Between 2013 and 2023, Venezuela dropped 42 places in the Press Freedom Index. According to estimations by the United Nations (UN) and Human Rights Watch, under Maduro's administration, more than 20,000 people have been subject to extrajudicial killings and seven million Venezuelans have been forced to flee the country.

If you don't describe that as fascism, you are the problem.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Maduro is not a fascist. I would recommend reading up on the meaning of the word before tossing it around so haphazardly.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maduro is widely considered a dictator, leading an authoritarian government characterized by electoral fraud, serious human rights abuses, rampant corruption, and severe economic hardship.

The UN Fact-Finding Mission on Venezuela concluded that the country's justice system independence has been deeply eroded; the mission also identified frequent due process violations, including political external interference and the admission of evidence through torture. Most Venezuelan television channels are controlled by the state, and information unfavourable to the government is not covered completely.

C'mon, man. If you want to play some "the facts available about him are lies" angle, I'd still think you're full of shit and move on with my life, but at least our disagreement would be a matter of belief rather than fact. You're going to read that and argue that it doesn't describe a fascist? While saying that my history degree leaves me unread on the subject?

Go fuck yourself, dude.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I guess you still didn't look up the definition of fascist?

I don't know what kind of history degree would leave you so ignorant of this issue but maybe you should ask for a refund.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I really hope this is some kind of poorly thought out gag.

Fascism is characterized by support for a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

So that's, what, 4/7 at a quick glance? If I had less to do I'd dig in a little and see if he fits the other three. Unfortunately, a spat on Lemmy isn't really worth the time.

It's not my job to teach you what words mean, and yet here I am. This will be my last good-faith response. If you're just here to troll, do it elsewhere.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That's the thing though. Those other three are pretty important.

It's not a troll, I just think fascism is uniquely dangerous and we should use words correctly. This is the same twisting of words that lets people smear Zelinsky or whoever as a fascist. You can always find some points of commonality but you need the whole definition to match, not just parts of it.

And saying it's open fascism is even more silly. It's only open fascism if they're self-describing that way. There aren't any openly fascist countries today.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You know, I lied. I appreciate an honest response, particularly when coming from such a vitriol laced exchange, so I take back that "last good-faith response" statement.

I do still disagree to some capacity, and think that your take is a matter of muddying the methodology with the goal/results. The autocratic dictator with a strangle hold on the media, using their own version of the law to kill/jail their political opponents, is far more important to what makes a fascist than other elements. But there's a genuine argument to be made that if I can't be bothered to do a deeper read on the guy and the state of current day Venezula, maybe I shouldn't throw around the F word so readily, so I'll take that. I stand by the "the short description is pretty likely a fascist dictator," but admit that, if we were to take a more serious, academic approach to it, I would absolutely be jumping the gun.

Regardless, I appreciate the de-escalation and genuine take on the subject. The snarky one liners and snap backs from both of us were disrespectful to both of us.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Cheers mate and I apologize for my tone which probably contributed to this conversation going in that direction initially. Sometimes that snark just feels so good haha.

Personally I prefer to describe these types of governments as run of the mill authoritarian (or totalitarian if they progress far enough). I do think the ultranationalism and xenophobia is an important aspect of fascism though--that's what makes them able to commit atrocities beyond just historical monarchies or other types of oppressive governments. The dehumanization of anyone who is different combined with that totalitarian power makes mass murder way more likely.

I don't see that in Venezuela right now but what I really wanted was for someone to make the case that it was rather than just saying they're fascist because they're bad. Yes, they are bad, but I really don't like the simplification of complex political ideas down into quasi-slurs.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fair enough. My use of the term fascist here was hyperbolic; likely erroneous. Ultranationalism is pretty important to fascism—dare i say fascism can't exist without it—so I'll fall on my own sword here.

It's only open fascism if they're self-describing that way. There aren't any openly fascist countries today.

I'd push back slightly here though. It isn't attractive to self identify as fascist these days, so i think we'd expect essentially no countries (or individuals) doing so. America is crypto-fascist as things stand under Trump.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure I agree, but to me the term "open fascist" implies there is no attempt to hide what they are. If you meant it otherwise then I don't understand what it's meant to imply.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I would characterize it as "oblivious fascism". The sort of, "If you think I'm a fascist because i believe x, then so be it" mentality

[–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Agreed but just to give you a counterpoint to your last part.

It’s not because they don’t describe themselves as fascist that they are not fascist. The European far-right hates it when you tell them that they are far right. They always respond by saying no I am « conservative » or « I just want to protect our culture » etc…

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah you can definitely be a fascist and hide that fact. This is very common.

But it wouldn't open fascism if you hide it.