this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
568 points (98.6% liked)

cats

25502 readers
1345 users here now

Typical internet cats. Videos, pics, memes, and discussion welcome!

Rule 1) Be kind

Rule 2) Follow the lemmy.world rules

other cat communities

midwest.social cats

cats with jobs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 81 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Not wanting a cat doesn't mean won't care for a cat. I said no to another cat because I'm not prepared to care for it on top of everything else I've got going on.

This whole "didn't want a cat but is secretly a softy" thing needs to die.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

And money. Animals are not cheap. Specially when they get problems. Not everyone is ready for all that it entails even if they love the animals.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Usually it’s more like “Doesn’t want to spend time and money on a pet” and/or “Doesn’t want to be sad when the pet inevitably passes on”

[–] aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The first one I get it, but the second... Then don't anything, why live when there is eventually suffering? Thats just a sad and misserable way to think damn. And there is actually people reasoning like this, why 😭

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Trauma, depression, ptsd, mental issues, not wanting yet another thing to push one over the edge, etc. The reasons to think and act like that are a lot. Not everyone lives life with rose tinted glasses.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago

I guess the reasoning is:

Pets usually die before their owners do.

In contrast, (human) children lives on and usually if things go well, parents never have to watch their kids die, and its kinda their "legacy". Pet's don't really have much of a "legacy", I mean other than working animals which can have a huge legacy of like maybe saving lives.

(I'm not saying I agree, just explaining their views)

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This whole “didn’t want a cat but is secretly a softy” thing needs to die.

Just because it does not accurately describe you does not mean it doesn't accurately describe many people

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No but it’s also encouraging people to not care about others limitations.

For example I love cats but I am too disabled to care for one.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 27 points 23 hours ago

Agreed, taking on the responsibility of caring for a pet and giving them the best life you can is a situation that requires a firm yes from all parties. Especially with how expensive everything is these days, pets are not cheap.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

I fully understand the boundaries and limitations side. There are a lot of people who label themselves "not a cat person" or "not a pet person" and don't interact with animals, based on this preconceived notion, and then are surprised when they enjoy it.

Not being able to take responsibility for another soul is reasonable.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

When my cousin came to visit me for a week, she literally yelled "no!" and hit my cat when he jumped onto her lap.

A week later, she said "I think I want a cat." Now she has a cat.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

Ladies and gentlemen every parent from the 80s.