this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
305 points (99.4% liked)

News

33299 readers
2126 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is like your boss finding shit to do when there's nothing to do.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Was scouts supposed to ge about fostering “masculine” values ever?

I never did it, but I always thought it was about learning useful skills and confidence, appreciating nature (leave the camp cleaner than you found it) and learning how to work towards your goals.

Those things are not inherently masculine. They’re for everyone.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. And growing up in NY my experience with them was a lot less toxic than what some people here are describing, so it really was pretty much just about that.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm from Jersey, and similar to you it was just a thing for boys to do. There was no homophobia, we accepted from the weird kid to the sporty kid, and eveyone in between, and sometimes there were cliques and sometimes we whittled soap. We went camping sometimes. There was fire, yeah, that seems to be ubiquitous among the boy scouts.

I stopped when I got bored. There were no scandals.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, as far as I know, none of the boys were being victimized by the orthodontist scout leader, and there was no serious religious aspect. Most of the kids were probably from liberal Jewish families who went to temple mainly on the high holidays, regardless. I quit because the camping trips kept getting cancelled, and that was the main reason I enjoyed it.

Christ, why can't we just have normal things that are what they're supposed to be, without wackjobs corrupting it?

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I think we can and do have normal things. I feel like exposure to mass media brings problems right to your door, and it just isn't how it is. At the same time, there is a bit of responsibility that falls on your (my) shoulders to be involved. I certainly won't stand by while some bullshit is going down especially bullshit that my kids are exposed to. I will let kids be kids, but I won't let them be poisoned with negative, fearful nonsense.

And so yeah, my response to much of the crippling depression that's blasted at us over the past 10 years has been to stick my head in the sand. And people here will chastise me for this, but I refuse to take on global problems when I've got things right here that need my attention. I know this isn't exactly what we're talking about, but I come to Lemmy to philosophize.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent.

Nope, nothing in there about masculine.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Ugh, I still remember that whole list by heart. I did and do take issue with "obedient" and "reverent." Question authority.

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so you don't thing women should be any of those things?

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm honestly not clear if this is a sarcastic comment or not.

For myself - those all seem like gender neutral virtues, viewed separately and together. I don't know that I agree with each one as a virtual, but I don't see anything that would or should apply to one gender more than another.

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

yeah, it was a mean spirited comment, I just get pissed off when positive traits get gendered. all of these are good things for people to be, doesn't matter the gender

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd say, as far as being distinct from the Girl Scouts, that the two groups had basically identical values and goals. Boy Scouts maybe leaned a little heavier on the camping and knot tying and outdoor skills, but both were mainly focused on building good character, community service, basic life skills, etc.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Like ten years ago, Girl Scouts in my town had a civil war, because they were leaning too heavily on “girl”activities. A bunch of the girls defected to Boy scouts to do “more fun activities”

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

It was mostly about setting things on fire in my experience.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It was created as a paramilitary organization so kind of?

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

This is the right take