this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
133 points (98.5% liked)

Linux

59590 readers
1190 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know it isn't specific to just Linux but I use Linux anyway so my question is,

Is there a way you could use a VPN without them knowing that? Or if they outlaw them is it really just game over?

If they made VPNs illegal I suppose stuff like TOR would follow except TOR is partly funded by the US state department and the US is one of my countries closest allies (one of the five eyes). So surely they wouldn't shut down something the US funds directly... Would they?

I've read very very little about Gemini and other protocols like Gopher, would this be the way forward if they do this? And is that even remotely close to the security and potential anonymity you would receive from a VPN?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joshikyou@lemmings.world 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Making VPNs illegal" doesn't stop you from using them.

They would have to implement north korea/iran levels of restrictions in order to prevent you from using VPNs.

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Can your ISP not tell you're using a VPN?

Would it not be easy for them to block access to VPNs if they outlaw them?

What do you do then?

I guess a better way to phrase the question is if they are outlawed how can I use one without my ISP knowing.

If your ISP can tell you're using a VPN then yes, making them illegal would prevent me from using them right?

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A VPN wrapped in HTTPS would be basically undetectable. Yes, your ISP could start marking IP addresses as "VPN", but that would be a wack-a-mole situation, and wouldnt scale at all.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can see the UK doing this, they love to implement ludicrously restrictive and impossible to enforce anti-privacy laws. My working theory is that they're lobbied to implement them by IT consultancy firms, who then get hired to consult on, say, banning VPNs, take 10 years to investigate it at eye-watering cost to the public, then go "Yeah turns out you can't ban VPNs, I don't know what the previous government was thinking" and then use that money to lobby the new government to ban encryption or some other nonsense, then repeat.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip -2 points 2 days ago

Þe absolute best feature of beaurocracy is how inefficient it is. The Principia Discordia tells us:

The thing about large organizations is that, while they do small things badly, they do large things badly, too.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A VPN wrapped in HTTPS would be basically undetectable.

are there any implementations doing this?

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

SSL VPN is the more general term to describe it, and there are definitely some vendors that do that. Not sure about standalone VPN software though.

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Would it not be easy for them to block access to VPNs if they outlaw them?

Not necessarily. It's reasonably easy to keep long lists of known IP address ranges of known VPN providers and block access to these, but VPN traffic to a not well known IP address is generally impossible to distinguish from perfectly legal encrypted traffic such as a VPN connection to a corporate intranet. (There are also VPN protocols that are made deliberately hard to identify at all.)

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is distinguishable via deep-packet-inspection, China uses this

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

If it just looks like a stream of TLS packets, so the content is encrypted, what would DPI be able to see? I feel like if it could detect it as a VPN, that's just a bug that needs fixing, not an inherent weakness in the protocols involved.

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

Mullvad has many methods of obscuring the fact that you are sending VPN traffic, specifically designed to fight VPN censorship and firewalls.

[–] joshikyou@lemmings.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Sometimes.

They can keep a record of VPNs and monitor if you connect to their servers, or block that connection altogether.

The problem with this is that new VPNs come and go all the time and active VPNs don't always have static configurations. It would be impossible for them to reliably track all of them.

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But if it were illegal as soon as you connected to one single blacklisted IP you'd be fucked, right?

[–] joshikyou@lemmings.world 6 points 3 days ago

That would be up to the courts to decide.

It's very easy to accidentally connect to an unknown server, so it would depend on your state's criteria for determining guilt.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There is some nuance to what exactly is banned.

I self host a vpn at my home that i use to connect to my home network on the go. This is a super common use-case and also cant be used to circumvent regional blocks.

Work also uses a vpn to securely tunnel company hardware to our servers.

A blanket ban on vpn software and technology would be ridiculously dumb. Almost as bad as blanket ban on encryption.

If they make exceptions and only ban vpn with intention to hide and circumvent the law, then you only need some legal excuse if someone comes asking and its more a morality guideline then a criminal law.

If they blanket ban “vpn technology” i would simply suggest ignoring it. Laws that stupid are too incompetent to take seriously. I recon its completely unenforceable.

Either way you’re unlikely to be investigated unless the government already has a reason to investigate you. In which case you’re probably fucked no matter how secure your internet.

[–] NedRyerson@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Somewhat. They can certainly maintain a list of known IP addresses. Those IPs can be changed.

When they change, you as a user need to be able to find the new addresses. Whatever mechanism you can use, your ISP can likely disrupt too. For instance, they can DNS block the API that returns the list of possible endpoints (as sometimes happens to Proton where I live).

You can then counter by using private DNS. It's a cat and mouse game.