this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
160 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

4591 readers
273 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jack Dorsey backs diVine, a Vine reboot that includes Vine's video archive of 6-second, looping videos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 56 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

However, unlike on traditional social media, where AI content is often haphazardly labeled, diVine will flag suspected generative AI content and prevent it from being posted.

Although I really enjoyed and kinda miss Vine, I think it's important to realize Vine was also a product of its time.
The internet culture changed a lot since Vine shutdown. Bringing Vine back won't bring that old culture back, and the 6-second limit is more likely to alienate new users used to the modern short-video platforms than anything.

I will give them props for trying to fight the seemingly unstoppable slop-ification of the internet, but ultimately it believe it would be best to leave Vine and the great memories we had with it on the past.

......Also, negative interest with interacting with Nostr and crypto powered social media 🀒

[–] warm@kbin.earth 20 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it is just going to be filled with shortened down tiktok slop rather than anything it would have been in the past.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The 6 second time limit and forced 3 time loop was really annoying. Short videos, sure. But maybe like average song length short. 3 minutes.

Then again, those quirks are what made some pretty memorable Vines πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

We have a billion platforms for longer vids. The shortness is what made vine amazing. They need to keep it that way.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago

3 minutes is a fucking movie marathon in modern content terms (and I'll never forgive big tech for it)

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (51 children)

Plus, because it’s built on Nostr, a decentralized protocol favored by Dorsey, and is open source, developers can set up and create their own apps and run their own hosts, relays, and media servers.

Sounds great in paper, in reality it amounts to little more than Twitter with Lightning (Bitcoin) duct-taped to the side

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

I don't think that's entirely fair; the Nostr protocol has a modular design philosophy, with most components being optional addons, including the Bitcoin payments stuff. It's genuinely decentralized and explicitly made to be easy to not use any baggage you don't like.

It's unclear from the article if the use of the protocol will also mean overlap with the content and community of Nostr, which is understandable to criticize, but the protocol itself is just another take on decentralized social media that does things differently than activitypub.

[–] iloveDigit@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago
  1. Lightning isn't Bitcoin

  2. Taping Lightning to the side of nostr sucks, but doesn't reduce it to "little more than Twitter"

load more comments (49 replies)
[–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

……Also, negative interest with interacting with Nostr and crypto powered social media 🀒

You're saying you hate piefed for actually using encryption for users to log into specific accounts before posting instead of just being anon posts like 4chan?

And you hate 4chan for using https instead of being like old BBS forums?

Or is it just nostr using decentralized logins that takes the cryptography too far for you?

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Colloquially crypto means crypto currencies or NFTs like bitcoin, not normal encryption.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 0 points 1 day ago

Right, and the point is that nostr isn't "crypto-powered" by that colloquial definition. It is "crypto-powered" in that it uses encryption though.