News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
It's "oops all manchins" as far as I'm concerned,
I don't think it's necessarily all Manchin's but I wouldn't be surprised if 30-70% were on a Manchin-like spectrum. I'm pretty sure that when most mainstream Democrats champion anything remotely progressive, they don't really want it to fully succeed (if at all) and would actually vote against the original legislation as written. The supposed champions are depending on Republicans and the open Manchin's to negotiate it down to something the champions would actually be willing to vote for.
I remember, years ago, Republicans put some extremely unpopular legislation up for a vote as a performative gesture knowing it would receive zero Democrat votes. Then one or maybe a few Democrats strategically voted in favor, knowing it would be catastrophic for the Republicans approval if they actually passed it in a Republican controlled Congress. Suddenly the remaining Republicans were forced to vote against the bill in order to prevent it from passing. I recall it was considered a very ballsy and impressive move from Democratic leadership.
Without the filibuster, the roles could absolutely be reversed... but the bill would be extremely popular and Republicans could show the true nature of the Democratic party as the Democrats purposely tank it to prevent it from actually passing.
That feels like a convenient and simple viewpoint. It must be easy for you.
It's a conclusion I've drawn from decades of behavior. No, it's not even remotely easy because the people who would crawl over used heroin needles to drink the bilge water from manchin's houseboat keep gaslighting and employing other methods of abuse against those who disagree with them from the left. There is no one who disagrees with them to the right.
From a functional standpoint, there is no democratic party.
Everyone has decades of experience with human behavior. Yours is no more valuable than anyone else's, so it's not a valid support of your argument.
Your opinion is easy because it's simple and convenient. For people facing harder realities, their opinions will vary, and that's ok. Those opinions are valid.
Peace and blessings.
There is no argument that supports any criticism of democrats as far as you're concerned.
Sometimes, things are simple.
"If you have a different opinion from my unconditional worship of the democratic party, it's because you have it easy, not because your experience is valid."
I never said your experience was invalid. I'm sorry but whoever trained you in rhetoric missed the mark completely. I'd ask for a refund, assuming you paid for it.
Sure you didn't. Just that mine's not worth anything and those of people whose opinions match your own are valid.
I'm sorry centrists think "gaslighting" and "debate" are synonyms.