politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
While I can sort of understand the argument that when the government is shut down it makes food distribution more difficult.
But I can’t understand a government actively taking action to prevent food distribution by entities that are working around the shutdown.
Yes, so they can declare martial law and work around the whole "elections" thing
Its so clear, I'm glad I'm not the only one saying this... its fucking disgusting.
Trump said that he would end elections. He hasn’t been subtle about it.
They can just do that anyway.
I think it's more fundamental - they hate the poor and want them to starve. Any higher strategic value is secondary to the suffering. They just want hunger and death.
They are Nazis, and Nazis think that only a select few people deserve to live. Most people they see as a burden on the human race, holding it back from its full potential. They also see caring for others as a weakness that holds humanity back (conveniently enough for them). This usually goes along with some shitty self-justifying bastardization of evolutionary theory and eugenics.
You know what's really holding back human potential? Needlessly starving people. There are probably thousands or millions of people who could be achieving great things if they weren't struggling to make ends meet. If we had universal basic income and people didn't have to worry so much about finding any job that will keep them from starving, people would be in a better position to go after jobs they really want and achieve their goals.
Yes. Any excuse to enact martial law and begin actively hunting their opposition like animals. They want to label those who fight back against their oppression as violent, lawless, fanatics.
For 1), they use "small government" as a campaign slogan, but they are in it solely for power. Same with "state's rights", unless they can't benefit from states having those rights.
Conservatives think everyone using services is a welfare queen by definition. So their solution is to kick people off, so that they're motivated to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, because then they'll be rich just like them, then everyone will be richer because they don't have to pay taxes, etc. To conservatives any government action is by definition bad and evil.
The first bit is right, but the goal is not to make everyone richer. It's to make themselves richer off the labor of everyone else, who can live a short miserable life of impoverished servitude and die young. They don't want to pay for the sick and elderly because they see those people as worthless since they can't contribute to making the billionaires more profit. And at the bottom of it is the idea that life is a competition with winners (the rich) who deserve to win and losers (everyone else) who deserve to lose, and the purpose of life is money and power.
They think the poor are poor because they didn't work hard enough. They think the sick are sick because they didn't work hard enough to get medical care. They think elderly that can't take care of themselves didn't work hard enough for their retirement. See everyone can be rich if they just worked. It worked for them (cough) so obviously everyone else didn't work hard enough.
Well, they looooove government when it comes to cops protecting only the parasitic class and beating on/jailing/killing the unworthy and military adventures abroad to do the same...
Even then they want private police.
Supposedly*
And, yes. Yes, they do want that.
I think they want to make it harder on folks when it is already hard enough. I hope leopards show up on their doorstep one day.
Nah, not really. The conservatives give a lot of lip service to such things, but that's not really what is motivating most of them.