this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
109 points (99.1% liked)
Asklemmy
51254 readers
455 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I get what you mean, you're not the only one. There are generations of games that have explicitly trained you on fast twitch button mashing with graceful dodge frames and intentionally engineered safeguards so rng is in your favor to bring about the best experience. And I'm not mocking you....it's just how it is and it gets me too. Trying to unlearn that is hard.
I also hate the 'difficult for the sake of difficult'. I know some people get a high over doing something incredible, but I don't get that from banging my head on the same thing over and over. Any souls, souls-like, souls-lite or weighty mechanics games like MH get a hard pass from me.
However, I really enjoyed Remnant, it's a mp souls-like - something about witnessing everyone's shenanigans but still being able to pick each other off the floor is a lot of fun. It feels different and more like what souls should have been (imho).
It's not so much button mashy vs not; it's the responsiveness. Take a step back from videogames even: if you were some medieval knight or w/e in a sword fight IRL: your sword is raising as you're initiating an attack, and you notice your opponent moving his blade toward a vulnerable spot you just left exposed.
So do you just follow through with the attack knowing there's a blade closing in on your axillary artery, accept your fate, take the blow, bleed out and die? Or, do you abort the attack in favor of a defensive move like lifting your shield or turning a bit so the blade hits your armor instead?
The former is what combat is like in DS (and MH... haven't tried the others).
It's unsatisfying flavor of difficulty... again comparable to sabotaging the controls of an otherwise not difficult at all experience (sponge taped to gameboy). Or like... say you need to do the dishes, and up the difficulty of the task by tying a toothbrush to the end of a 5' stick and scrubbing them with that from the far corner of the kitchen. The task is difficult now, but that doesn't make it fun, just tedious.
Just pulled up Remnant - I don't think I've ever seen that game before. The Steam pics/vids look pretty great: I'm getting VERY strong Secret World Legends vibes (which is a fantastic game despite having god-awful combat). I'll throw it on my wishlist and see if I can snag it on a good sale.