Fuck AI

4546 readers

1526 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

251

AI gets 45% of news wrong — but readers still trust it (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 6 days ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The BBC and the European Broadcasting Union have produced a large study of how well AI chatbots handle summarising the news. In short: badly.

The researchers asked ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity about current events. 45% of the chatbot answers had at least one major issue. 31% were seriously wrong and 20% had major inaccuracies, from hallucinations or outdated sources. This is across multiple languages and multiple countries.

The AI distortions are “significant and systemic in nature.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You know it's an unfixable problem because the AI boosters are trying so hard to gaslight everyone into thinking that this is a feature, not a bug.

"You don't actually want an AI that doesn't hallucinate — that would take away its cReAtIvItY!"

[–] T156@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

It's not wrong to think of it that way, but at the same time, there's a very good question of why you want a model capable of creative writing summarising your news to begin with.

It's basically like an overstuffed kitchen gadget.