this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
347 points (98.9% liked)

News

36871 readers
2601 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That and a larger amygdala...

The brain can change well into your 60s, but the differences between conservative/liberal brain's is so obvious that with like 15 minutes of training anyone can correctly determine political leaning with around an 80% accuracy rate

Which sounds pretty accurate until you remember that ~30% don't vote...

And then it becomes freaky accurate.

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Have any links, videos, ect I can check out that back up those claims?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ideological differences between partisans may reflect distinct neural processes, and they can predict who’s right and who’s left of center with 82.9 percent accuracy, outperforming the “your parents pick your party” model. It also out-predicts another neural model based on differences in brain structure, which distinguishes liberals from conservatives with 71.6 percent accuracy.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/study-predicts-political-beliefs-with-83-percent-accuracy-17536124/

Nothing wrong with asking for a source, but it's a good habit to try yourself first. Especially with the lower activity in Lemmy.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The article you sent does not say that anyone can do it with 15 min. of training. It speaks of different levels of activity in different parts of the brain in an MRI scan. I myself do not have an MD, but I'm pretty sure reading an MRI to look at brain activity takes a little bit more effort.

I may have misinterpreted your previous message a bit as well, but as I understood it you implied that the way your amygdala is determines your political leanings. The article says it may be the other way around, like with London cab drivers having their brains change as they study the layout of the city. I'm sorry if I misunderstood you there.

Have a good day and thanks for sending this :)

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

I’m pretty sure reading an MRI to look at brain activity takes a little bit more effort.

It doesn't...

You point at the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala.

If one is big and the other small, that's enough to categorize.

I know most people aren't aware of it, but its not some super rare phenomena that only a single article has been written about it, and that article contains everything.

That's fundamental though, that applies to almost every time someone says something they know, then finds a relevant article off the first page of a search engine.

I didn't go thru my comment line by line and source every comment with an article that backs up everything I said.

Use some critical thinking

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

the differences between conservative/liberal brain’s is so obvious that with like 15 minutes of training anyone can correctly determine political leaning with around an 80% accuracy rate

This reads like pseudoscience to me. Sounds like you're leaning on cultural touchstones to describe physiological differences.

And then it becomes freaky accurate.

Polling would be substantially more accurate if it was.