Asklemmy

51061 readers

667 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

What do you think about each Lemmy instance trying to be a Reddit alternative? (reddthat.com)

submitted 15 hours ago by PumpkinDrama@reddthat.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It feels like many Lemmy instances end up trying to be “Reddit replacements,” which results in dozens of very similar communities with overlapping topics. I wonder if it would make more sense for each instance to focus on a broad topic, like sports, literature, or technology, and then have communities for the subtopics within that.

What are your thoughts? Do you prefer many general instances, or would you rather see topic-focused instances?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I think it's a good thing, because it discourages centralisation. If we end up with a bunch of specialist instances, then diversity suffers, because everyone looking for a specific area will end up on the one single specialist instance dedicated to it.

And I say that as the admin of an instance focused on the trans and gender diverse folk. There is a reason that we don't enforce specialisation on those topics in our instance communities though. Even so, we still tend to be "the trans instance", when I'd much prefer it if we were just one of many, like we are on the microblog part of the fediverse.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think Hexbear.net counts as a trans instance, it has one of if not the most active trans-specific communities on Lemmy in general and around half the userbase is queer at minimum, according to polling.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Hexbear is very protective of it's trans users and it has a lot of them. But its "specialist area" is politics.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think that boxes them in a bit more, being very queer and protective of queer users is related to being leftists. They are also heavily vegan, which is also informed by politics. I think everyone that's pro-queer rights, and is a part of the queer community, kind of has to be engaged in politics as a matter of survival. Queer instances have to take anti-bigotry stances, which includes exclusion of the right-wing.

I do understand what you mean better now, though.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Well, in that regards, they're similar to blahaj, as in, our instance doesn't just have trans communities. Our user base is focused on trans and gender diverse folk however. Hexbear, similarly, has all sorts of communities, but their userbase is focused on shared politics, even though their areas of discussion are not restricted to that.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yup, it combats echo instances better this way. And if one instance gets seized by a tyrant, then there is an alternative.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

I can understand from the perspective that I prefer to refer to myself as a woman rather than a transwoman. Human or person works too