Main, home of the dope ass bear.
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, as a bit I like to say I want to make the far authleft point on the political compass look like the libertarian right, but every time I've actually done a political compass test, I basically never land all that authoritarian. I do tend to land to the leftmost edge, though. I just don't think the political compass is all that useful as political analysis, tbh. The "Overton Window" is a good tool for explaining the accepted political range of a community, but for assessing individual or party positions, it's just not a useful means of analysis. Like, most actual positions people actually hold tend to fall along a diagonal strip of it from libleft to authright, and while libright people and groups do exist, they're generally incoherent, have no realistically practicable policy aims, are self contradictory, etc, and the "authleft" as most of these tests determine it... really doesn't exist outside of a handful of MLs who do it for the bit.