this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
90 points (98.9% liked)

Gaming

33112 readers
49 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Bigger changes like vehicles and destruction would turn the game into something else entirely and even if they were only available in a side mode, I reckon Valve has numbers showing that not enough people would care enough to actually play it (like the Battle Royal mode, which I'm still salty they removed).

This all falls prey to the self fulfilling prophecy of only listening to your toxic competitive playerbase though.

Call Of Duty has a DIZZYING number of fun modes but it still has competitive Search & Destroy lobbies too, the only conflict here is in an actively hostile competitive scene treating any change even if it doesn't effect the competitive modes as a threat to be dogpiled on.

Ignoring all the monetisation, which is basically a pipeline into gambling addiction for kids.

Also, I refuse to ignore this in any conversation about Counter Strike, it is fucked up.

[โ€“] horse@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Also, I refuse to ignore this in any conversation about Counter Strike, it is fucked up.

Honestly, that's fair. Valve gets a lot of good will for making good games, but the fact that they happily allow Counter-Strike to enable what's essentially a casino for kids has got to be one of the most scummy things in video game monetisation.