Main, home of the dope ass bear.
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
view the rest of the comments
well i think that if the us becomes a socialist nation (in one way or another), the constitution will have to be reformed, the government will have to be restructured to fit within a socialist framework (i was thinking of de leonism and council communism), and a second bill of rights would be ratified.
How does this differ from adopting a new constitution in practice?
i think some socialists here in the us advocate for the us government to be reorganized to fit within a socialist framework.
That didn't really answer my question, but it seems like you might have issues with communication and social cues.
i actually have autism. seriously.
I figured as much. I wish the other people here would be more considerate of that.
what was the question you asked again?
I was asking about what the difference was between reforming the constitution, and adopting a new constitution but keeping elements of the old one.
i think the difference between the two happens to be an article v convention.