118
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
118 points (93.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43373 readers
1441 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The reason it's hard to build muscle, is muscles are incredibly inefficient and a huge calorie sink.
If you're heavily muscled, you're using more calories even if you're not working out. Just reaching out to grab something takes more energy.
So building muscle means you have a higher caloric baseline.
And that's not even getting into calorie density. 150 calories worth of beans will keep you feeling full for a long time, and a 12 ounce can of soda won't make anyone feel full because it's all liquid already.
Then there's physically eating slower and chewing more, because we evolved to not feel full if we're still eating.
Reducing it just down to "eat less calories than you use" is technically correct, but it's the details that help people.