this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13918 readers
750 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Redbolshevik2@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (6 children)

The hole is the part where you really have to suspend all disbelief to carry water for the official story. The fuselage, which is made of cardboard, maintains structural integrity while the wings and engines, made of materials hundreds if not thousands of times stronger, completely dissolved without a trace.

[–] panopticon@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

The wings carry fuel and they're made of carbon fiber and aluminum, lightweight materials. They have to be light relative to the overall mass of the plane to minimize wing loading.

The fuselage contains landing gear, bulkheads, cargo, fuel, APU, and so on, which are not lightweight and not made of cardboard (WTF?) and the body is oriented longitudinally so it drives all that mass into a smaller cross section, whereas the wings distribute their impact over a wider area.

Also, there were conspicuous scorch marks on the wall in the shape of the wings, with a bigger, deeper mark where the engines were, which you'd expect if the fuel in the wings exploded and the entire wing assemblies disintegrated. Also, it doesn't really make sense that the Pentagon would attack itself with a missile. If they want to assassinate people they'll just kill them through covert means. If they need to destroy evidence they'll burn it.

The more incredible story is the missile one, you have to suspend critical thinking and ignore important facts to believe it.

[–] Redbolshevik2@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Also, there were conspicuous scorch marks on the wall in the shape of the wings, with a bigger, deeper mark where the engines were, which you'd expect if the fuel in the wings exploded and the entire wing assemblies disintegrated.

https://api.time.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/fbi-release-pentagon-photos4.jpg

No there weren't.

It's very obvious you haven't done even the most basic of research.

[–] panopticon@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

Yes there were

Also components of a jet engine were found on the Pentagon grounds, here's a fairly indepth post from an aerospace engineer: https://aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml

load more comments (3 replies)