news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
view the rest of the comments
It's important to keep in mind that a lot of jobs are ultimately bullshit jobs that simply exist to make companies look more valuable to investors. The selection pressures in the current environment favor building Potemkin villages to convince investors to give them money as opposed to actually being profitable in any way.
Incidentally, have a personal anecdote on the subject I can share. I worked for a startup a few years back, and when I was hired it had around 60 people. The app they were making was incredible simple, and in no way justified the size of the company. They were around for about half a decade already, yet they made very little actual revenue with most of the money coming from VC funding. Then the Silicon Valley Bank crashed, and all of a sudden funding started to dry up. As a result, they were forced to shift their business strategy towards being solvent. The company ended up letting go of most people cutting down to around 10 or so which was the realistic number of people needed to develop the product. They're still around today, but their product architecture is much simpler and the size of the company is still much smaller.
I expect we'll see a lot of this happening when the AI bubble pops. Companies will either figure out ways to actually be profitable, or they will simply go under. I expect the latter will be the case for the vast majority because they don't have a viable business model. The crash will result in a huge reserve army of labor being created and the few surviving companies will have little trouble hiring people back. In fact, I expect that the dynamic will significantly shift in favor of the employers are a result.
Isn't this in contradiction with the supposed value that generative AI creates for firms? The whole point of the hype bubble is the speculation that they will be able to eliminate jobs to save on labor costs.
exactly, now startup executives can bilk investors using ai to replace dozens of bullshit jobs with automated bullshit. think of the savings!
Or just gesture at AI and not actually use it. In the example given, the firm started at around 60 people to attract investment and then stabilized at around 10. With AI hype they can skip that step where they start off with 60 people to attract investment and just start out with the 10 they really need, and explain their small startup staff as being a result of efficiencies created by AI.
Surely this is a real economy that produces real value and isn't a circus tent of clowns picking each other's pockets.
That's the new paradigm the AI companies are selling. Their claim is that they will be able to eliminate a lot of the need for human labor that currently exists. If that were to actually happen then investors would have to adjust how they evaluate growth of the companies they invest into. The number of employees has always been just a lazy metric that companies learned to game anyways. This can easily end up being swapped for a different superficial metric like the number of LLM tokens the companies are consuming.