this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
175 points (98.3% liked)

Selfhosted

52276 readers
378 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The question about the single most favorite self hosted software is impossible to answer.

I struggled with that but for me i treated it as one I've been most hyped about this past year

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Docker? Without it life would be difficult so self host

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why is this? I've never used docker before and when I set up my server a couple years ago, I installed Debian, Apache, and MariaDB and got everything set up relatively easily.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The problem is when one app requires a different apache(or some other random requisite) version than the other one, docker just deals with that so I don't have to. That's what I like about it.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dependency hell is self-inflicted, but sparkle-junkie devs are complicit: it's their fault they don't know of long-term-support enterprise OSes and don't use one as a primary port.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But it also keeps the junk in a near little area which I can easily get rid of.
No need to look up how to do a clean install.

I would say it's purpose can be used like a live-ISO of an OS.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

No need to look up how to do a clean install.

The suggestion you don't know that enterprise OSes have been doing clean installs and removals of a product and all its dependencies for 25 years as a critical test before issuing said packages suggests you're working around too many problems without solving them.

We did devops by pxe-based kickstart and then simple package updates before devops was even a word. It still does better than Ansible does now.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I actually just had to deal with this! So, I ended up spending time troubleshooting and rewriting some .conf files for Apache.

[–] madeofpendletonwool@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because with docker you don't even have to install and setup Apache and MariaDB. You run one command and it knocks out that whole process. Not go mention the security implications of completely seperating your software.

I can also speak from experience when I say it makes development and delivery of software soooo much easier. As a self hosted software developer I can promise you that if I created an instruction set to deploy the software I build bare metal rather than just containerizing it. No offense to fellow self hosters by any means, but if I require a multi step instruction set rather than a one liner docker command I will get more issues. Humans make mistakes, and when I can automate it out with container orchestration it absolutely makes it easier for the user.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I appreciate the response! When I set out to self-host, I made the decision to install everything separately, because I heard about docker and it sounded like, "plug in code and run". And that's something I didn't want, only because it was a hobby and I wanted to learn more from a hands on experience. I learned a ton, sorting through those errors! If I did it over again, I'd probably use docker, based on your explanation, but I feel like that is an endeavor, in and of itself.

I went with Jellyfin because it's the one I use the most. It also gives me the most headaches, so it's a mixed bag.

[–] UnfairUtan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Easy Immich reply for me

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

For me it's Bitwarden, hosting their stack in 2018 right after getting my first job launched me into everything else.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 1 points 2 weeks ago

I named Bookwyrm. There isn't so much going on update wise, but it's a fun software with a nice community

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also had to think, but I went for CloudPanel. Fantastic server manager software from Germany. Reverse proxy my docker containers with it. Lean. Stable. Reliable.

Fuck cPanel or Plesk with their bullshit licenses.

[–] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

i did searxng main thing i use that i host