this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
59 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14325 readers
520 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What's with the whole "structural damage because of the fire" thing? Is there a reason why mentioned that or was he just being a smartass?
establishing a narrative
Sorry but what is the narrative here? I know there are some conspiracy theories about involving fire (jet fuel and steel beams). This this related to that?
idk i'm not fully versed or sold on the conspiracies (ie: controlled demolition), but if we are to believe this guy is being handled to give this statement, I would guess he emphasizes "damage caused by fire leading to collapse" to provide eye-witness testimony to the Official Account, and deter people from seeking alternate explanations
He probably said that confidently like it was an undisputable fact to convince watchers of this story he was telling for whatever reason