this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
51 points (96.4% liked)
technology
24211 readers
373 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe I'm a big dumb dumb doodoo head but can't you limit the kid's screentime physically rather than digitally
It feels like involving software just complicates the situation
the research on this is pretty clear
The best amount of screen time at young ages is none at all. If a child must have screen time, then the best way to do it is to do it alongside them as a parent in order to demonstrate responsible device usage and keep the child engaged in media and not consuming it mindlessly. Children get better at coping as they get older but at no age does it become acceptable to just let them mainline digital content with no limitations or filters.
This seems like a leap to say "the research is clear" when the source you cited says itself that more research is needed.
Yes because I'm annoyed by this and booty's comment. I didn't open this discussion, and while I wouldn't mind some unsolicited advice, these interrogative questions are a bit annoying. Instead of asking about age, you could just differ to my judgement, and what I already said about screen time being completely passive.
Actually it seems by your unwillingness to contribute to the conversation that you are annoyed by it, which would be fine if you just said that. But what we're trying to do is help you solve a problem you have said you're facing. Our goals are aligned with yours.
In order to do that, since some of us are of the opinion that your approach is fundamentally flawed (restricting via software) we're trying to work with you to find out an alternate approach. The first one offered was to talk to the child. You have implied that is impossible because the child is too young.
So I suggested not handing the child a tablet or smartphone or whatever at all. I don't see any way in which any interaction with such a device could be beneficial to such a young child at all, except maybe communication with a physically distant family member or something. Certainly not unsupervised! Like, I'm understanding correctly that you have handed a child who is too young to discuss complex topics with a smart device and just walked off? Please tell me that's not correct.
And please explain at what point in all this we moved from "acceptable unsolicited advice" to "annoying." Is it the point at which you realized you might have been wrong about something?
I don't mind the criticism, but something that seems to be missing from this conversation is age, same with hello_hello's comment. Depending on age, screen time can indeed be entirely passive, and let's not forget that kids lack self discipline.
Hmm yes it is mysteriously missing from the conversation. Next time we'll have to remember to read your mind so we can figure out how old your kid is
Simply don't hand the tablet to a 3 year old, they do not need any interaction with that technology whatsoever.