Come on. This courtroom artist can't be serious with this goofy ass depiction of Luigi. The nose, the skin tone, the thin neck. Did I miss the memo? Are Italians no longer white? lmao

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 59 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Why are court drawings? Is there some sort of a liberal theater that prevents just filming the whole thing?

[–] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 52 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Federal and some states (in this case NY) forbid cameras in courtrooms, hence the drawings. I'm sure there's some antiquated BS reason for it that I can't be bothered to look up.

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The common justification I hear for this is to avoid making a trial a media spectacle. If there is no camera then you can't act for the camera

[–] KoboldKomrade@hexbear.net 44 points 2 weeks ago

Which is BS because its a spectle anyway. Only thing no cameras does is protect the judge when they decide to be a fash.

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 40 points 2 weeks ago

It's because there was some courtroom incident where it was absolutely flooded with independent photographers and they caused some sort of incident

I don't know why they didn't just say "okay we got one guy whose job it is to take pictures" instead of calling up a fucking art school

[–] ClassIsOver@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because if we don't keep at least some of the art buskers legitimately employed, we'll end up with another Vienna Academy of Fine Arts situation.

[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

it's a bit late for that

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

Liberals believe the law is a paranormal force that exerts magical power, so they treat the courtroom like a temple