this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
237 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34787 readers
1216 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If AI ends up running companies better than people, won’t shareholders demand the switch? A board isn’t paying a CEO $20 million a year for tradition, they’re paying for results. If an AI can do the job cheaper and get better returns, investors will force it.

And since corporations are already treated as “people” under the law, replacing a human CEO with an AI isn’t just swapping a worker for a machine, it’s one “person” handing control to another.

That means CEOs would eventually have to replace themselves, not because they want to, but because the system leaves them no choice. And AI would be considered a "person" under the law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

From what people on Lemmy say, a CEO (and board) isn't there to do a good job they are there to be a fall guy if something goes wrong, protecting shareholders from prosecution. Can AI do that?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It can do so even better than a human. They would just announce a patch for it

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's brilliant! So long as the AI company has a board to take the fall for any big AI mistakes.

[–] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

AI will assess all risks and make a bet, if it fails it will have a fund available to compensate the losses.

[–] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess in theory there would be no need for a fall guy as AI would cover all angles.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But the fall guy is for things they know they shouldn't do. They aren't trying to only do the things they should.

[–] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Evil companies will have evil AI

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do they take the fall exactly,"millions in a golden parachute, and high-fives on the way to next ceo job?" At least you could turn the AI off.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, that's one way it happens. CEOs can serve different purposes, but a CEO who's job it is is to be hated and take the blame for actions the board company wants done then get fired with a payout and move on to the next job? That's definitely a thing.

An AI wouldn't be able to do that job because they can't be fired. Or on second thought, the board can change the AI program to a different company every few years.

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago

I accept your proposal to turn off ceos when there leadership results in the death and injury of humans.