News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Retribution against who? We don't know who did it or if they were associated with any group.
The ‘who’ was decided long before Kirk was shot. Trump has been praying for this day. He doesn’t give a shit about who shot Kirk. Trump can tell his cultists anything and they will believe it. Shit, Trump could have shot Kirk himself, on camera, and his imbecile army would believe it was the ghost of Jimmy Carter if Trump said so. People are saying that this is the spark that will touch off Trump’s retribution. Bitches, his retribution was already well underway.
This is actually unironically true, and it's unbelievably sad.
Yep.
The fbi fuck didn't make a "mistake".
This was planned
to justify the violence they want to do
against the "left" aka anyone who doesn't go along with the nazi "maga" project 25 agenda.
I'm pretty sure you know who: whoever they're scapegoating this month, which is probably us.
But the real reason they want a civil war is that they think they have the upper hand and can establish minority rule.
That's an impressive amount of exactly-right squeezed into very few words.
They do have the upper hand. They have the military, the supreme court, the congress and the executive. The 2024 election was literally the last chance to stop what's here and what's to come.
You're dumb, the right always know who did what. They are basically all Sherlock Holmes. /s
Headline: Ammo Found In Charlie Kirk Assassination Engraved With Pro-Trans, Anti-Fascist Ideology
Link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ammo-found-in-charlie-kirk-assassination-engraved-with-pro-trans-anti-fascist-ideology-wsj/ar-AA1Mmwvp
My understanding is that info is bogus. Notice it comes from the WSJ.
Multiple outlets are reporting the same information though.
All of the ones I can find point back to the WSJ as the source. Are there any that have a different source saying that?
https://abcnews.go.com/US/charlie-kirk-shooting-fbi-appeals-tips-manhunt-continues/story?id=125469211
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/charlie-kirk-shot-suspect-utah-manhunt-b2824720.html
Here's more, but you can just google the keywords "charlie kirk shooter trans" and find more. It's not fully confirmed by every agency yet, I've just seen it reported by multiple sources is all.
Neither of those articles mention the word "trans" at all. It looks more likely that that part's BS.
I don't think it's a false flag operation. But this makes it sound like a false flag operation
You think that's going to stop a determined idiot?
No, the question is purely rhetorical.