Image is from this article, showing a march by the United Socialist Party of Venezuela Youth. The preamble's information came from a few sources, such as here, here, and here.
Over the last few weeks, pressure on Venezuela from the US has mounted as their newest proxy, Gonzalez, lost the election to Maduro. The Trump administration now alleges that Maduro is the mastermind behind the "Cartel of Suns," raised the bounty on Maduro's head from $25 million to $50 million, and is working to deploy troops and naval assets to the region.
While I would not consider myself an expert, I believe an explicit boots-on-the-ground campaign by the US in Venezuela would be, at best, implausible, though the administration has not explicitly denied it (and even if it did deny it, denials by the US are merely confirmations that are being delayed). What seems much more likely is an intensification of a subversive campaign against Venezuela which seeks to further isolate it, with intelligence from the US given to whatever groups and individuals exist inside the country. There are certainly some parallels in regard to recent US belligerence towards Mexico, with both countries being implicitly or explicitly threatened with military force under the guise of "preventing drug trafficking" - and, of course, spreading drugs is one of America's greatest specialities.
Will this work? I don't know, though I am optimistic about Venezuela's chances. The Venezuelan government does seem to be taking this threat with a refreshing degree of seriousness - with over 4 million militia members being activated across the country as of August 18th, as well as a call from Maduro to the armed forces to be on high alert. The socialist youth of Venezuela are being mobilized in defense of the revolution.
Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
Israel's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
IAGS Resolution on the Situation in Gaza
(International Association of Genocide Scholars . FINAL Assesment.
Recognising that, since the horrific Hamas-led attack of 7 October 2023, which itself constitutes international crimes, the government of Israel has engaged in systematic and widespread crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide, including indiscriminate and deliberate attacks against the civilians and civilian infrastructure (hospitals, homes, commercial buildings, etc.) of Gaza, which, according to official UN estimates, at the date of this resolution, has killed more than 59,000 adults and children in Gaza;
Recognising that these crimes are estimated to have left many thousands of people buried under the rubble or otherwise inaccessible, and most probably dead; Recognising that this bombing and other violence is estimated to have injured more than 143,000 people, with many maimed;
Recognising that the actions of the Israeli government against Palestinians have included torture, arbitrary detention, and sexual and reproductive violence; deliberate attacks on medical professionals, humanitarian aid workers and journalists; and the deliberate deprivation of food, water, medicine, and electricity essential to the survival of the population;
Recognising that Israel has forcibly displaced nearly all of the 2.3 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip multiple times, and demolished more than 90 percent of the housing infrastructure in the territory; Recognising that the consequences of these crimes have included destroying entire families and multiple generations of Palestinians;
Recognising that Israel has destroyed schools, universities, libraries, museums, and archives, all of them essential to the continued existence of Palestinian collective well-being and identity;
Recognising that Israel has killed or injured more than 50,000 children and that this destruction of a substantial part of a group constitutes genocide, as emphasized in a joint declaration of intervention in the International Court of Justice case of The Gambia v Myanmar by six countries—Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom— which states “that children form a substantial part of the groups protected by the Genocide Convention, and that the targeting of children provides an indication of the intention to destroy a group as such, at least in part. Children are essential to the survival of any group as such, since the physical destruction of the group is assured where it is unable to regenerate itself.”;
Recognising that Israeli governmental leaders, war cabinet ministers, and senior army officers have made explicit statements of “intent to destroy”, characterizing Palestinians in Gaza as a whole as enemies and “human animals” and stating the intention of inflicting “maximum damage” on Gaza, “flattening Gaza,” and turning Gaza into “hell”;
Recognising that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has endorsed the current US President's plan to forcibly expel all Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, with no right of return, in what Navi Pillay, head of the UN Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, has said amounts to ethnic cleansing;
Recognising that the deliberate destruction of agricultural fields, food warehouses, and bakeries and other violence that prevents food production, in conjunction with denial and restriction of humanitarian aid, indicate the intentional infliction of unlivable conditions resulting in starvation of Palestinians in Gaza;
Acknowledging that, on 21 November 2024, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant of Israel, in the court's ongoing investigation opened on 3 March 2021, of crimes committed on Palestinian territory since 13 June 2014, charging them with crimes identified in the Rome Statute, in the Gaza Strip from at least 8 October 2023, including the starvation of civilians, intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population, murder, and persecution;
Whereas Israel's actions in response to the October 7 attack and subsequent holding of hostages have not only been directed against the Hamas group responsible for these, but have also targeted the entire Gazan population;
Acknowledging that the International Court of Justice found in three provisional measures order in the case of South Africa v. Israel — January, March, and May 2024 — that it is plausible that Israel is committing genocide in its attack in Gaza and ordered Israel to take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement of genocide and to ensure the provision of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza;
Acknowledging that leading global international law organizations and UN bodies, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Forensic Architecture, DAWN, B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, and the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, have conducted extensive investigations and issued reports concluding that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza;
Acknowledging that a number of Israeli, Palestinian, Jewish, and other scholarly experts working in Holocaust and Genocide Studies and in International Law have concluded that Israeli governmental and military actions constitute genocide;
Acknowledging that international civil society has a responsibility to prevent genocide by encouraging and assisting states to fulfil their obligations under the Genocide Convention to prevent, suppress, and punish genocide;
Acknowledging that putative security measures against members of a group are often pretext for mass killing and genocide as it has become in this case;
Therefore, the International Association of Genocide Scholars:
Declares that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide in Article II of the United Nations Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948);
Declares that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity as defined in international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;
Calls upon the government of Israel to immediately cease all acts that constitute genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity against Palestinians in Gaza, including deliberate attacks against and killing of civilians including children; starvation; deprivation of humanitarian aid, water, fuel, and other items essential to the survival of the population; sexual and reproductive violence; and forced displacement of the population;
Calls upon the government of Israel to comply with the Provisional Measures orders of the International Court of Justice;
Calls upon the state parties of the International Criminal Court to comply with their obligations, cooperate with the Court, and surrender any individual subject to an arrest warrant;
Calls upon all states to actively pursue policies to ensure respect for their obligations under international law, including under the Genocide Convention, the Arms Trade Treaty and international humanitarian law, with regards to Israel and Palestine; and
Calls upon the government of Israel and all other United Nations members to support a process of repair and transitional justice that will afford democracy, freedom, dignity, and security for all people of Gaza.
Current as of 28 July 2025 Resolution passed 31 August 2025
No, but seriously, that's still good news. At least it's a good thing to have for throwing at libs, like grandepequeño said, and better late than never.
Gotta love how it leads with unconditional condemnation of Hamas without a single attempt to challenge the Israeli narrative of the events, let alone the wider context of the operation.
Yeah, I noticed. For white people, it would probably have read slightly different:
Spoiler
"Pending a conclusive report about the ongoing internal investigation of the resistance alliance, we see it as our responsibility to solemnly withhold our judgement. It would be premature to contribute to the circulation of rash accusations about possible missteps of individual members of the Hamas and/or allied groups special forces during the planning and/or the operational phase of the anti-apartheit operation against the occupying genocidal terror regime on October seventh. It's important to remember, that service members on active front line duty in such an operation are under a lot of pressure, while aiming to make the best and most ethical decisions in a chaotic situation. If singular cases of use of excessive force did indeed occur during the detainment of individual armed illegal settlers resisting arrest, then the question must be asked, if the Hamas service member making the arrest had reason to feel threatened by any sudden movements or other violent display of the relevant member of the fascist death cult that is Israel."This is Big, so No Spoiler Tag.
can you explain why it's big/why this matters?
I mean it's somewhat politically useful to throw at libs who need shit like this as confirmation, or in theory maybe some powerful institutions could act too. But in practice this genocide is so fucking obvious that, like, anyone who needs something like this to individually consider it a genocide is...idk
An amoral monster. Lost in the sauce. Pro-genocide.
As are the writers of this report and recognition of genocide which is too little too late and not worded nearly strongly or clearly enough. Better than never in an absolute sense but too little to change the facts and still too light in condemnation, reserving it for the current government/ruling parties/prime minster rather than the entity as a whole with its population who demonstrably in polls support genocide. It's been obvious that genocidal intentions exist towards the Palestinian people for decades now and none of these groups have called them out or rightly castigated the existence of the zionist entity as an existence predicated on and depending on genocide and that without genocide it cannot exist or continue to exist.
Further the equivocation on Oct 7th, the idea history started on Oct 7th is naked cowardice and intellectual dishonesty. It's like starting history at the events of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising and condemning the Jews there for killing some Germans without you know including context on how the Nazis forced them into there, discriminated against Jews and openly announced their intent to genocide Jews and had been oppressing them for years. The facts are the case for genocide is much stronger against "israel" when you include pre-Oct 7th history including snipers maiming children during the peaceful great march of return, the decades of settler violence the IOF doesn't stop and protects by preventing retaliation, the various discriminatory policies and half a century of hateful, genocidal, supremacist rhetoric of erasure.
Anyone denying it's a genocide at this point has so much cognitive dissonance they will call any person or organization antisemitic.
Something , Something ....
German Basic Law (the GG)
Article : (1) Human dignity shall be inviolable. To respect and protect it shall be the duty of all state authority.
Article : The general rules of international law shall be an integral part of federal law. They shall take precedence over the laws and directly create rights and duties for the inhabitants of the federal territory.
German Criminal Code :
Section 130 :
Incitement to hatred
(1) Whosoever, in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace
incites hatred against segments of the population or calls for violent or arbitrary measures against them; or
assaults the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously maligning, or defaming segments of the population,
shall be liable to imprisonment from three months to five years.
(2) Whosoever
[...]
shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding three years or a fine.
( Julius Streicher )
But this is just a statement from, essentially, academics, and doesn't carry legal weight unless introduced into a case and approved of by a court, right? Unless this group has some special status under German law or something?
it carries enormous legal weight behind it as a reference in a numbers of court cases that follow. How do you counter such a reference in a court ? what could weight higher to reference "nah ha : its No Genocide"
This hole legal Avenue thing obviously in not immune in general to "Power and Influence" so there is always the possibility of courts still not giviing a fuck ,
but that would then delegitizme them and also , given the international dimension , threathen the Judges themself that dismissed such cases , And for the Cowardly Judge that would normaly fall to Zionist Pressure Networks, he has Also the currently "Highest and Final Refrence" to shield himself behind it.
Its basiclly the shift in the Dynamic of "elite-self-Protection- Strategy" towards beeing "pro Palestine"beiing the clear optimum position for self protection.
EDIT: Dafur Jeziden , all the recent Genozides where assesst as such by this institution.
sounds like a nothing burger tbh, like maybe relevant to some liberals many years down the line but not actually meaningful and certainly not going to do anything to help end the genocide
Its Offical and Final ..
hexbear videcheck experts - oh that probably means nothing....
I meant "weight" in the sense of "does a court have to follow this opinion if a lawyer cites it" - I guess I should have said "authority" instead. No matter how respected an institution is, the place where it matters in terms of real difference - whether it can be enforced against the governments and military companies - is in court. Still, very good to see this development.
And yes I agree, often courts still don't give a fuck because of power and influence.
turn it around ,
how could a court not follow this expert opinion. how does he explain it away , and what refrence does it follow instead .. even if its 100% ideologicly willing to shield the Zionist , it cant do so easly.
how in Detail would a court manage to do that? It first would assume for itself a higher Authority then the highest genozidel Expert Authority.
I'm not trying to get into an argument here, I just meant that I don't think courts have a legal obligation to follow the opinion of experts, even if they are the highest authority. For example they could say something like "well we respect their opinion but we won't recognise the genocide until parliament does" or something equally weaselly. A lot of the time they try to avoid having to make the decision at all
Germany constantly violates the Grundgesetz, like arresting people protesting against genocide which I was taught at school was a "right" given to german citizens. Tbf despite legalism being general more important to germans, it means little and less in the end. Hell, it took an irish woman being punched in the face on camera for libs to maybe question the extremely violent behaviour of the police.
to do what ?
My only criticism of the Al Aqsa flood is that there was no Al Aqsa flood 2