this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

news

24253 readers
535 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Alaskaball@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
carpoftruth@hexbear.net
Breath_Of_The_Snake@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
59
“These were not negotiations” (www.sz-dossier.de)
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Arnaud Bertrand

This is extraordinary. For the many of you who wonder how the EU could agree to such a humiliating "deal" with Trump, wonder no more.

We have an unusually straightforward answer directly from the horse's mouth: Sabine Weyand, who's the Directorate-General for Trade at the EU commission.

As she puts its:

  • "If you didn't hear me say the word 'negotiation' – that's because there wasn't one." => the U.S. dictated the terms
  • "From the Commission's perspective, this was a strategic compromise, not an ideal economic solution" => they're aware this completely f*cks the EU economically
  • "The European side was under massive pressure to find a quick solution to stabilize transatlantic relations – especially with regard to security guarantees" => the EU agreed to the "deal" under a protection racket
  • "We have a land war on the European continent. And we are completely dependent on the United States. The member states were not prepared to take the risk of further escalation – that would have been the consequence of European countermeasures." => Europe acted out of fear, choosing economic submission because of its total dependence on the U.S. (which ironically will only worsen the dependence)

There you have it, she said the quiet part out loud: the EU is in such a terrible strategic situation and EU leaders have so little courage that they're unable and unwilling to say 'no' to even the most humiliating demands.

https://xcancel.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1960603151154790469

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i just want someone to stand up to Trump and he'll fold like a paper towel. Why can't anyone see that? Do you have no way to act in an emergency, create powers and support of the European economy that doesn't infringe on your precious EU, while standing up to the crook?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In order to stand up to Trump, you actually have to have credible alternatives. Trump understands that the EU has been backed into a corner, and whatever damage there is to the US, it will be far worse for the EU. The only option the EU had was China, and they rejected that. Now, daddy is coming to collect.

[–] sisatici@hexbear.net -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Man, I would be very happy if Europe actually stood against usa. We are talking about Europe, not a colonised country with 2 million population and 90% their land as dessert . Europe has no one but theirselves if they can not stand up to USA. They have so many options and they chose the worst of them

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

We are talking about Europe

not a colonised country

Word country there doing a lot of liftin'

[–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We are talking about Europe, not a colonised country with 2 million population and 90% their land as dessert.

🤨 ... يا سلام

Interesting choice of words...

A stronger EU would consequently mean the EU immediately cranking up their imperialism and colonization game on the Global South like it's the 1800s. Multipolarity without the EU would be much preferred thank you very much..

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

90% their land as dessert

Man, why does no one ever talk about Caketopia's enduring struggle against European imperialism