541
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bobman@unilem.org 4 points 10 months ago

In a true democracy, we'd have direct voting.

Which I'm a huge fan of. Not sure why we'd vote for people who won't agree with us on everything when we can just vote ourselves and get true representation.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I’d prefer a republic, what the hell do I know about complex foreign policies with the relationship between Sudan and Egypt, or which tax policy will spur economic growth?

[-] bobman@unilem.org 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's fine. Just don't complain when the people you elect go against what you think is right.

Personally, I think direct voting would result in people voting for the matters they care about, while ignoring the ones they don't.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Nah, I blame the Republicans for most of the nations current woes since, you know, they tend to be behind most of them.

Plus, how can you see how the average American acts and think we’re still good for a democracy? We need a more fitting class of people to rule, as Adams and Hamilton envisioned it.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

What do you think should be the criteria to be included in "a more fitting class of people?"

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Some sort of an aristocratic society of intelligent men and women but that would be dreaming

[-] bobman@unilem.org 1 points 10 months ago

Republicans are mostly to blame. Democrats are just the lesser evil.

Lo' and behold, evil is still evil.

It doesn't make sense to support the lesser evil when you could support no evil at all.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

Aren’t you so lucky to be someone who can choose to sit on the fence and not suffer the consequences. Do you understand idiotic that statement is?

Jesus Christ, I hate to do Godwins Law here but just because when you have one side that is Nazi Germany that wants to dominate the world, kill all the undesirables, all that good stuff. Then you take a gander at the British; sure, they are a world colonial empire that deserves to be shattered but they are a democracy that DOESN’T dream of world conquest and killing everyone on earth, so any nonbraindead person would pick the side of the “br’ish”.

And you, over there just sitting there thinking “heh, one side has a small amount of evil while the other is the embodiment of evil so I’m going to do nothing.”

Sure, an extreme example, but the principal is the exact same.

Take Civil Rights, just because sometimes the civil rights people may be annoying and rarely takes a few things too far DOESN’T mean they’re the same as the horrific segregationists and the KKK, who’ll kill and lynch whoever they don’t like.

Please, grow and learn.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Imagine going “My choices are between the Nazis or the British Empire” and thinking the answer is one of them and not burning the whole thing down if that’s the best it can offer you.

You get what you settle for.

[-] bobman@unilem.org 1 points 10 months ago

Calm down. I stopped reading as soon as you came at me with animosity.

If you want me to take you seriously, talk with less emotion and more logical reasoning.

[-] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Between their shenanigans in India and Ireland the British empire was arguably worse than nazi Germany lmao what a dumb analogy

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

You really are a dumbass, aren’t ya? Making an argument that the Nazis were all that bad.

I suppose that’s fair, any concession, no matter how small, will constitute a defeat to your side so you must stand your ground and defend the undefendable.

[-] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Oh the nazis were horrible. The British empire was worse. The Indian famine, intentionally caused by the crown, killed almost 11 million people. Why are you downplaying genocide? Couldn't you pick a country that didn't kill an equal amount of people as the nazis during the same time period to play the "good guys" in your scenario?

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Hey stupid, the Nazis killed 6 million Jews, they killed about 11 million in the concentration camps. Imagine how many would be dead if they enacted Generalost Plan.

Fucking dipshit.

[-] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

So killing 11 million people is bad, right? If yes, why are you ok with the British empire doing it? It's equal parts gross and hilarious that you're downplaying their attempts at genocide by using them as the good guys in your scenario.

I really think we need to amend the constitution to allow a true democratic vote of no confidence for all federally elected positions.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
541 points (94.6% liked)

News

21718 readers
3563 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS