this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
84 points (90.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7173 readers
641 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think the University of East London is a low tier educational institution, and so to attract attention it resorts to advertising like this.

It is interesting how much climate research is being done at frankly low quality universities. This is not to say the overall science is wrong, but rather it shows how the research economy works with low quality universities "jumping on the bandwagon" to get research money and try to build up their media reputation.

The University of East Anglia is another example of this. They like to play on how they are one of the "most cited" research centres in the world. But this is a bad metric as it just reflects the nature of the research economy. There is a massive volume of frankly shit "research" in all fields, and only a small percentage in any field is of any value. Also to be clear, this also not to say that all research from the UEA is crap or all the people working for them are poor. Rather, it is just an example of how lots of institutions operate in a bloated and overly commercialised research & university sector, and the newer or lower reputation places are aggressive in marketing themselves.

So yeah, a marketing poster from the University of East London is not worth contemplating too hard.

[โ€“] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

I guess it's the university form of ragebait.