this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
164 points (93.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34039 readers
1302 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I support free and open source software (FOSS) like VLC, Qbittorrent, LibreOffice, Gimp...

But why do people say that it's as secure or more secure than closed source software?

From what I understand, closed source software don't disclose their code.

If you want to see the source code of Photoshop, you actually need to work for Adobe. Otherwise, you need to be some kind of freaking retro-engineering expert.

But open source has their code available to the entire world on websites like Github or Gitlab.

Isn't that actually also helping hackers?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's simple really, you have two people selling you a padlock, one has a challenge for anyone who can break it to earn bragging rights, the other comes in a black cardboard box that you can't remove. Would you lock your stuff with something that tells people "I'm secure, prove me wrong" or with what can be anything from a padlock that will close and never let you open it again to an empty cardboard box that anyone can break with their hands?

It's the same thing with software, you need to realize that for every black hat (what people refer to as hackers) out there there are dozens of white hats (security experts that earn their living by finding and reporting security flaws in software). So for open source software that means that the chance of a security issue being found by a white hat is much higher, and if it's found by a black hat you have millions of people trying to figure out how he did it, where's the vulnerability and how to fix it. Whereas for closed software you never know if it has been breached, and white hats can't investigate and find a solution, so you depend on the security team from the company (which is most likely a small team of maybe 5 people of we're being generous) to figure it out and make a fix.

[–] fatalicus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then you have the padlock makers that say "Our lock is secure, prove us wrong", then sue you when you do.

[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lawful Good: "Hello! I’m the lockpicking lawyer and today we have ……"

Chaotic Good: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/1HS-duJa8DU