(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
I’d go with:
Russian
Mandarin
Korean
Spanish
Ancient Sumerian as a casual own to thr archeologists.
I’m already fluent in English and Spanish, and mildly proficient in German and Mandarin.
The next languages on my list, after improving my fluency in German and Mandarin, are:
Latin, French, Portuguese
Ancient and Modern Greek
Sanskrit and Hindi
Irish (language of many of my recent ancestors and endangered language)
Guaraní (I plan to live in Paraguay would actually use this regularly living there).
Russian
Arabic
I know that’s more than 5, but these are all languages I have begun to dabble in at various points, and I feel like if I learned all of them to fluency or near fluency, my language learning obsession would finally be satisfied and I could retire from it, so to speak.
I would love to learn Hindi, but I came to realize my brain could not discern between several different sounds. I physically couls not recognize that the letters sounded different in any way. It was there that I found my limits and humbly backed off.
Don't let that stop you. Languages don't work as isolated sounds so don't overly focus on those. You have extra homophones to disambiguate, yes, but which examples are you actually worried about where context won't help you out, where you can't ask for a little clarification, or turn on subtitles?
I struggle with speech recognition generally so, while I've given up on the balanced approach of traditional courses, I've had success concentrating more on reading for learning (Japanese, which has lots of homophones) and using listening exercises as training for learning that way later on. I can describe what I've found helpful if you want the details.
You are actually not alone in this, it’s totally normal to not perceive the difference in sounds which are not phonemic in your native language. This can be overcome by training with minimal pairs. There’s a great bit about this in a book called Fluent Forever.
Edit: I just got out of a doctor’s appt and have time now so I’ll just paraphrase as I remember it. When we are babies our brains learn to ignore the difference in sounds that don’t cause a change in meaning. So a child growing up in an English speaking environment has no trouble differentiating the English language “R” and “L” sounds from each other. Japanese doesn’t distinguish these sounds, and has its own sound which is somewhere in between. So when Japanese speakers hear either sound, their brain just puts both into the same bucket.
If you play an audio recording for a Japanese listener and then ask them whether that said “rug” or “lug”, they literally can’t hear the difference. This is normal. But if you play audio recordings like this- “Rug” and “Lug” are minimal pairs, words that differ only by one phoneme - ask the listener which word they heard AND immediately give them feedback on whether their response was correct or incorrect, they learn to differentiate the sounds rather quickly.
Hindi has a lot of retroflex consonants that likely don’t exist phonemically in your language. It’s only natural that you cannot distinguish them. But by training your ear with minimal pairs, you will learn to hear the difference. You could try searching “Hindi minimal pairs training” or check out the book I mentioned, the author actually has compiled resources for various specific languages.
That's interesting! I might look into that.