this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
483 points (96.4% liked)

Fuck AI

4700 readers
1320 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You just copy and pasted the same crap you gave to everyone who replied without even reading what I said, there was no hypocrisy in what I said, therefor you missed the point and I have no reason to explain myself to you.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Stop lying. Using the same car analogy isn't a copy and paste.

Doing something that sucks more while complaining about those that do things that sucks less is hypocrisy.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You have yet to read my original comment, lmao. Not a surprise, you probably let AI think for you.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This is what I replied to:

"Something that sucks is slightly less bad for the environment than something that also sucks. Wow very good argument"

Is there something else you are referring to that I missed?

You resort to insults because you have no defense for your argument.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And you replied calling me a hypocrite for liking one thing and disliking the other, despite me saying that both sucked?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Great argument." was sarcasm which implies you didn't believe your earlier statement.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, it implies it's a bad defense of AI saying a bad thing isn't as bad as another bad thing doesn't negate that the first thing is bad.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Calling out hypocrisy isn't a claim that one of the two bad things isn't also bad.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But you weren't calling out hypocrisy, you were just blindly defending AI even though I clearly stated both things were bad you still claimed it was hypocrisy.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I specifically called out hypocrisy! Over and over, that's all I did in my response to you.

Actually read what I wrote.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You called out hypocrisy when I wasn't being hypocritical. And then despite me pointing that out atleast 3 times now you are still blinding defending AI

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You were defending the hypocritical point of view.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Where? At no point was I doing that. In fact you are the one being hypocritical by defending AI but calling other things that have similar environment effects bad.