this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
366 points (97.9% liked)

News

31557 readers
3560 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Roll call for this vote if you want to see how your representative voted and perhaps give them some feedback.

EDIT: The Clerk’s website went down earlier. When it came back up, it looks like they’re returning the wrong results. The vote to table the impeachment resolution was roll call #175, the number you see in the URL. It looks like it’s now displaying the results for roll call #178 on the page, a vote to adjourn. I’ve updated the link to an alternate view that seems to be returning the results for the correct vote, but please check the title of page in case this gets broken again.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's confusing, given all Republicans voted Nay.

[–] ernest314@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Alternative link corroborating the original article: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/119-2025/h175

I'm not sure what's going on with the first link, but that website is impossible to navigate for me.

[–] AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Nice so the site is down now what a joke

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Holy crap - We have complicit Oligarchs and not a opposition party. We as the kids say - are cooked.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What exactly do you think the impeachment inquiry will accomplish with a Republican house and senate majority?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The same thing democrats accomplished when they had majorities in both houses. Keeping excuse makers busy.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Service unavailable on my end. I assume due to high demand, not censorship. I hope so at least.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Honestly at this point I feel like censorship is more likely than not.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see her down in the O’s with a Nay vote. (Which, confusingly, is a vote in favor of impeachment, as the vote was to table the motion.)

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Edit: I've removed the screenshot because the page is currently showing the wrong vote.

It seems like either they changed the page, or everyone is having trouble reading it (or maybe I am?). ~~Here's AOC's vote on that page, listed as "Yea" for "motion to adjourn".~~

~~The "Nay" vote is listed as winning, but everything about this feels backward, so I'm not sure what to make of it.~~

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They’re no longer serving up the correct vote. The vote to table the impeachment was roll call #175, you can see the number in the URL. It looks like they’re now showing the votes for roll call #178, a vote to adjourn.

EDIT: this link seems to be working better https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll175.xml

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thank you!

Another user posted a different link for the actual vote.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So she voted No to impeach? Fucking for real.

[–] alyqz@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 month ago

This was a vote to table. A no vote is a vote for impeachment, or at least continue the process toward it.

[–] ernest314@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no, the vote was whether to ignore the impeachment, so "no" is the correct vote here

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm confused... all the Republicans voted nay? What am I missing?

[–] ernest314@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Not sure what's going on with that website--maybe it going down earlier messed things up? Here's another (much easier to read) source which corroborates the original article: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/119-2025/h175