this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
244 points (96.2% liked)
Microblog Memes
11045 readers
610 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's true but I prefer my criticisms without ad hominems
Where's the source for discrediting the statement?
How do you prove "hidden" groups don't exist?
Come onnnnnn. If that were the case, then there’d be no God, peace be upon It.
Fair point. Could be a quote from a relevant expert saying "I think it's bullshit" maybe?
I guess he is a relevant expert? And I think his tone suggests his judgement on the matter's bullshitosity.
OK thanks for the context. The post is overly elliptic.
I say I think it's Bullshit
Guess I, a random dude on the Internet, should have more credibility than this fraud
Saying a person spreading Israeli propaganda. Openly worked for an Israeli propaganda organization seems relevant to me....
https://theintercept.com/2024/03/03/wolf-blitzer-aipac-israel-si-kenan-cnn/
Like, I think you don't know what an "ad hominem" is if you believe this is one
Mmh... Somebody could hypothetically have worked for AIPAC in the past and become a staunch opponent of Israel's policy
For me, not specifically knowing the guy in question, using the shortcut "has worked for AIPAC" -> "is a mouthpiece of Israel" isn't a really solid argument
So, thanks for the link, this is what I missed
I'd be surprised if you could find a single example...
AIPAC uses bribes as the carrot, then if you go against them, the being up past carrots (bribes) and use the disclosure of them as "the stick".
Like, do you not understand how state back propaganda works? AIPAC works hand in hand with Israeli intelligence and their administration.
Literally the only reason AIPAC exists is because it's predessor had to register as a foreign agent, so AIPAC replaced it and immediately bribed the people who decide who has to register as a foreign agent....
This isn't a one off specific issue you missed ...
You seem completely unaware what AIPAC actually is and what they do...
But still feel the need to weigh in. Why?
Why not spend 15 minutes reading up on AIPAC?
Sorry I'm not an American! FFS
That's fine...
I'm not saying you need to be an expert on everything.
I'm just asking you to at least familiarize yourself with things you want to discuss, before making assumptions and defending genocidal religious extremists.
because lots of people view genocide as a serious topic...
I was asking about some context and everyone gets rabid. Super cool.
How am I supposed to know who the twitter guy is? You really research everyone you hear about on this community?
Astounding.
I get it but you could apply it to the post itself.
I don't see why asking for sources is mocked.
Because when provided with positive evidence of obvious bias, you demanded proof of a negative which is ranges from prohibitively difficult to impossible. This is not a valid form of reasoning. The inability to disprove something is not a valid reason to believe in it.
Let me put it another way, I don't converse with paedophiles so I'm going to need proof that you've never diddled kids before we can continue.
It was hardly evidence. It was a quip.
Here we go. Amazing and terribly clever.
Damn, no evidence provided.
Pedophile confirmed.
How is this an ad hominem? If he's being accused of pushing Israeli propaganda, the fact that he formerly worked for an Israeli lobby is 100% relevant.