206
submitted 1 year ago by silvercove to c/technology@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

More importantly, hold musk responsible for the mayhem. They call it "full self driving" when it has not qualified to be called that.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 17 points 1 year ago

I agree. However, I also acknowledge that with the US's legal fiction that "Corporations are people," it's unlikely that any CEO will ever be held personally responsible for anything except failing to make enough profit for greedy moneygrubbers.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Corporate death penalty. Revoke their corporate charter. No more company.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 5 points 1 year ago

While I personally agree, under US shareholder-primacy laws, this would likely be impossible in the current era.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

That's not true. Corporations can't commit crimes because they are just legal entities. People commit crimes.

Your main issue is that many things that you think are crimes (dumping waste, not paying employees, stiffing suppliers, accidents) are not crimes. They are civil or regulatory issues. If you care, you should pick one and lobby your state to make it a crime.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 13 points 1 year ago

Corporations can’t commit crimes because they are just legal entities.

The US Supreme Court begs to differ:

The list goes on.

[M]any things that you think are crimes (dumping waste, not paying employees, stiffing suppliers, accidents) are not crimes.

Again, the US federal and state governments would like a word. There's not a locale in the country that considers theft and intentional illegal pollution not to be criminal acts with fines and, for natural person, imprisonment as punishments. However, you are correct that accidents are generally not considered crimes, although penalties may still apply if they were the result of carelessness or neglect.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's straight fraud. FTC should penalize them for every fsd car sold. And make them liable for each crash when it was enabled.

[-] TheYang@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Well, it's a beta for "full self driving" and it's really quite easy to argue that it even is capable of doing that. It's just not really close to the required certainty. It propably acts fine in 99%+ of decisions. It's just such a bitch to get that last percent filled in as much as required

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll clarify, I don't mind it being called FSD beta because that is the end goal, but Elon has tweeted about FSD being "released" and very public accidents have occurred shortly afterwards. He should be adding disclaimers all over, but instead he makes it sound like it's totally safe.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
206 points (90.9% liked)

Technology

35123 readers
64 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS