Why do people connect their home security, thermostats, or refrigerators to the internet? Because they’re designed, first and foremost, as data collectors. Users discover after the fact that they don’t actually own anything, and the company hides behind software licenses to maintain their control.
CaptObvious
And France yawned
Moving on….
TBF, it isn’t unlike parents ~~pimping~~ (ahem) “managing” their kids in music, film, and TV
You’ve obviously not paid attention to McConnell and Trump weaponizing US courts
You’re describing quasi-public, not public, spaces under US law. Different countries, different laws
I’m in the US. Guess I just haven’t tried to access them on mobile Safari in a while since this was new to me.
I generally find NPR the most bearable of US news outlets. I also used to run a member station newsroom and reported for the network a few times during those years.
BBC lost credibility several years ago for hosts talking more than guests and putting words into the guests’ mouth. Their paywall was just a curious additional insult.
Why does Reuters, or the BBC for that matter, think I’ll pay a subscription when ads outweigh the story?
There were a few sites that would run scripts for you during Rexxit. The one I used would poison your data at random times over a few days to be sure of infecting backups. The last round was a deliberate violation of the TOS and offensive enough to force them to remove it immediately. Worked like a charm, as I recall.
Had an account there -- briefly -- 10? years ago. Deleted it as soon as I noticed my employer's personnel office activity and posting non-existent "jobs." Realized that LinkedIn is only useful as a data harvester and HR honeypot.
Europe has an age-gated social media ban? Is this where Australia got the idea?
Good idea
Nobody’s perfect. But if you really don’t like Starmer, I’ll trade you Trump for him