You’re describing quasi-public, not public, spaces under US law. Different countries, different laws
CaptObvious
I’m in the US. Guess I just haven’t tried to access them on mobile Safari in a while since this was new to me.
I generally find NPR the most bearable of US news outlets. I also used to run a member station newsroom and reported for the network a few times during those years.
BBC lost credibility several years ago for hosts talking more than guests and putting words into the guests’ mouth. Their paywall was just a curious additional insult.
Why does Reuters, or the BBC for that matter, think I’ll pay a subscription when ads outweigh the story?
There were a few sites that would run scripts for you during Rexxit. The one I used would poison your data at random times over a few days to be sure of infecting backups. The last round was a deliberate violation of the TOS and offensive enough to force them to remove it immediately. Worked like a charm, as I recall.
Had an account there -- briefly -- 10? years ago. Deleted it as soon as I noticed my employer's personnel office activity and posting non-existent "jobs." Realized that LinkedIn is only useful as a data harvester and HR honeypot.
Europe has an age-gated social media ban? Is this where Australia got the idea?
Good idea
I can see good arguments on both sides. On one hand, the current mechanic hands every member state a veto on everything. On the other, if too many members get dragged into domestically unpopular adventures by a foreign majority, other countries will withdraw, either formally or by simply refusing to participate in Brussels.
Then again, given that one of the ~~Heritage Foundation’s~~ (ahem) “Trump Administration’s” stated goals is to dismantle the EU, perhaps Merz’s government are simply useful idiots
Mandela Effect on a global scale. I don’t like this timeline. I want to get back to the real one ASAP. ;)
And they’re providing cover for authoritarian urges in Europe and the US, being nominally part of the “West”
You’ve obviously not paid attention to McConnell and Trump weaponizing US courts