this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
1237 points (99.5% liked)

News

36018 readers
1990 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Several service members told advocacy groups they felt like pawns in a political game and assignment was unnecessary

California national guards troops and marines deployed to Los Angeles to help restore order after days of protest against the Trump administration have told friends and family members they are deeply unhappy about the assignment and worry their only meaningful role will be as pawns in a political battle they do not want to join.

Three different advocacy organisations representing military families said they had heard from dozens of affected service members who expressed discomfort about being drawn into a domestic policing operation outside their normal field of operations. The groups said they have heard no countervailing opinions.

“The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn’t the kind of national security we signed up for,” said Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative, which represents the interests of military spouses, children and veterans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 29 points 8 months ago (4 children)

How about invading a country halfway around the world that didn't do anything to us?

That should be a great morale booster, historically.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The main difference there is that they can be unfamiliar with that country and believe what they are told about it.

Hard to be unfamiliar with the country you grew up in, and only 30% of the population is willing to believe what they are being told about it now despite their life experiences not showing that to be the case. I mean since when have those types of people been "scared" of Californians?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago

Hard to be unfamiliar with the country you grew up in

If anyone can do it, it's Americans. I've had arguments with Americans who insist that New Mexico is in Mexico despite it being called New Mexico.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the primary difference here is they know the population they're oppressing so it's difficult to wholly believe the propaganda.

When being imperialists abroad, they're fed a steady stream of propaganda about how they're the hero, that they're saving democracy, babies, capitalism, and what not. Most of them don't speak the language and have difficulty relating to the local population. Americans are notoriously ignorant of everything outside the US (fine, in the US too) and the locals they're defrauding are understandably afraid and/or hostile, so many don't learn otherwise or don't want to accept otherwise. Imagine the blow to the psyche of switching gears from "great American saviour" to "brown kid murder machine to make rich people richer". That's tough.

Now the lies are much harder to believe. They speak the language, share the culture, and some are at least vaguely familiar with the events leading up to these protests. While 1/3 of the US population are utter numpties, the remaining 2/3 are at least likely redeemable and some of that larger fraction is likely present in the military. They know what they're doing is wrong and don't believe the propaganda telling them otherwise.

Now we'll see if any have the courage to stand against this. I'm not holding my breath.

[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

This is part of why Russian troops faced and still face severe morale dips in Ukraine, because Ukrainians can speak directly to them and ask them what they are doing and why they are killing them.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Judging by the suicide rates, that wasn't either.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Well, Israel has the right to defend itself and have a foreign policy. Not like some other countries that are just bad bad bad.