281
submitted 1 year ago by btaf45@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Ukrainian officials say their military is now using a long-range missile that was designed and manufactured domestically and can reach targets inside Russia

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarienGS@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Or, they've found a viable way to disguise donated long-range missiles so they can be used to strike back at Russia without implicating the country that provided them.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

These are 100% identifiable from debris. No one would be fooled by such a farce.

[-] flying_monkies@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

At this point, if Russia stated they were hit with a long range missile from "Country X" and provided pictures of identifiable debris, would anyone actually believe them?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Hexbear would!

[-] Wodge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I doubt anyone would actually care. They're getting weapons from NATO members, Russia wouldn't do anything in retaliation.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Russia would VERY MUCH care, and so would any NATO nation for what it'd mean. If a NATO weapon hits Russia, Russia will at minimum start actually threatening nuclear strikes, and probably throw down a lot more of their military to start threatening NATO directly.

No, they wouldn't win sh*t anyways, even if they started using the four nukes that are still operational, but a properly thrashing Russia would be very ugly for the whole region regardless of how fast NATO 'could' end Russia.

[-] Wodge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Russia has already threatened nuclear strikes. Russia is all threats and no hot sauce. No one believes Putey any more.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Oh I know, but after he'd me making threats he actually meant (and still couldn't pull off) while impotently pounding his fist on a mile long table.

[-] ALERT@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

does it matter?

[-] Dremor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That would have been a possibility if someone donated them some. Wich isn't the case yet, at least officially.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

You're not going to officially admit to receiving a missile you're planning to plausibly deny using.

[-] Dremor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sure. Absence of proof isn't proof of absence, but nor is it a proof of occurence. Best we can do is to wait for someone to do an error in order to be able to know a bit more.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
281 points (97.6% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2678 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS