this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
154 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13821 readers
834 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's baffling more people support this system. A lot of popular shops all over my state have closed not because they weren't making money, but because they could no longer afford to rent the buildings they were in. After closing, they've sat empty for years. Landlords would rather make $0 each month than charge less rent.

Of course, liberals and other chuds will blame nonsense like crime, immigrants, minimum wage, and so on before they blame any actual reasons.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Chuds pat themselves on the back for being soooo brave to have the courage^TM^ to say that if all homeless people and minorities get genocided, that would solve the housing crisis?

But the nanosecond anyone calls out landlords being greedy you’re either called a naive kid at best or you get lectured by the same people who just advocated genocide on how it’s not nice to tell landlords they have enough.

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

It’s crazy! Like, even if for some reason we want to keep the whole landlord thing going, there are guardrails you could put up to prevent them from rotting out the cores of our cities.

Like, make it so the current tenant gets the right to keep paying the current rate until the landlord finds someone who’s willing to pay the higher one. If someone wants it, great, fine, you can close the old business and let the new tenant open. But if you can’t find a new tenant for the higher rent, don’t let the building literally rot instead.