this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
1121 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3778 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell appeared to freeze for about 30 seconds on Wednesday while speaking with reporters after a speech in Covington, Kentucky.

The incident is similar to an episode McConnell experienced at the US Capitol late last month and is likely to raise additional questions about the fitness of the 81-year-old to lead the Senate Republican caucus.

Wednesday’s episode occurred when a reporter asked the Republican leader if he was planning to run for reelection in 2026. McConnell had to ask him to repeat the question several times, chuckled for a moment, and then paused.

Someone at his side then asked him, “Did you hear the question, senator, running for reelection in 2026?” McConnell did not respond.

Article includes video of the incident.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madex@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Americans stop voting old white dudes and ruining the rest of the world please.

[–] Razp@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just stop voting old dudes period. A white old dude is as unsuitable to govern as a non-white old dude.

Vote for younger and more progressive generation.

[–] Madex@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm from UK and we need to stop that shit also.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think we have anyone in McConnells or Feinsteins states in parliament right now. Maybe in the Lord's as it's lifetime peerages but they probably don't turn up anyway.

[–] Razp@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But BoJo, Liz, Rishi and Starmer aren't that old.

[–] Madex@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

if you could choose one....

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's hard when the DNC and RNC hand-pick the candidates for us. Our primaries are a sham

[–] raptor102888@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the real problem.

[–] Crabhands@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bingo. The problem here is old, not white or men. Only white, or only men is a separate problem, which is maybe what they meant.

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll disagree. Old is part of the problem but the huge majority of the problem is OLD AND WHITE. Literally America's biggest issue. If you don't think so, you're either a troll or you live in a bubble.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don't think so, you're either a troll or you live in a bubble.

Weird, on a totally unrelated note: what do you think is driving the burgeoning popularity of white supremacists across the U.S.?

Just curious what your take is, considering you've clearly thought about this topic.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Have you not noticed how many towns and cities across the USA are designed? White people tend to live in the northern part of the city, while darker people tend to live in the southern part of the city.

That's not by accident, the city planners design it that way, and they have different regulations and taxes and shit depending whether you live north or south of the highway or tracks...

[–] RDAM_Whiskers@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

I don't fuckin want them either. It's our fuckin boomers who want to take everything to the grave with them.

[–] Ninjasftw@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's not be descrimatory here. I don't think Dianne Feinstein is doing too well either:)

[–] kroy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Weekend at Feinstein's

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Kentucky is going to Kentucky. Hold my beer while I burn the state to the ground. I lived there and it was disheartening how many people vote against their self interest.

[–] Chunk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because to most people in Kentucky keeping America safe from Hillary Clinton is more important than healthcare, abortion access, or school funding. Those voters have shown us their priorities, time and time again, and they truly care more about culture war nonsense than anything else.

[–] TechnoBabble@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They're just voting for the only party who pretends to care about them.

Democrats have spent almost no energy on making rural voters feel included.

If you saw everything you've ever known decay into the shambles of globalization, then some orange guy comes and starts yelling about how he's going to fight for your way of life, while the other guy is talking to the people who have been shaming you for decades, who do you think you'd vote for?

If we want a better future, we're going to have to get over all this hatred towards our neighbors. Waving your hands around a map and saying "fuck allll these (rural) people" isn't going to work anymore, because China/Russia know exactly how to exploit that hate.