this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
104 points (99.1% liked)
Casual Conversation
3204 readers
451 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Don't escalate unless you want to deal with more of this
“Don’t deal with this unless you want to deal with it” my sibling in Christ, that’s what dealing with it means.
That's not what I said - I said don't escalate. The problem has already been dealt with by fixing the bug. There's a chance that's the mystery dickhead will never be seen again if you make it a non-event. If you reach out and taunt them, you're just asking for more trouble
Which is why you don't "reach out and taunt them", but report them to the university.
This has some real strong "well if she didn't want to get raped she shouldn't have been dressing like that" energy
Nothing happened here except a small project website temporarily lagging. Nobody has been assaulted here, which makes this an extremely different situation than that.
It absolutely doesn't. The comment doesn't assign blame to OP at all, it's a recommendation that continuing to engage with this person will just cause more problems - a pretty normal thing to acknowledge when it comes to dealing with petty, weird people who just want to mess with strangers.