this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
860 points (99.3% liked)

World News

46009 readers
4830 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

You know who has a lot of these minerals? Greenland.

[–] mrmule@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If you've been to Greenland it you'll realize how inaccessible these mineral deposits are. And with no roads connecting towns it becomes a logistical nightmare. Oh and the place is covered in thick ice and snow for 10 months of the year. There have been mining companies dying there for the last 50 years, 1. Because of legislation and 2 because it's virtually impossible to mine.

[–] mke@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

I've seen jokes(?) that they're aiming high, as in, aiming for high global temperatures to handle the ice. Stupidity wouldn't describe it, it'd be insanity... But isn't that what this administration is all about?

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh. That's why China was fighting so hard to buy the Tanbreez site during the last administration and why the US had to exert soft power on 4 different countries to buy it out from under them.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

The U.S. has a surprising amount of known rare earth deposits but the deposits aren’t really being explored extensively, much less mined because of economic reasons. The U.S. has the 4th largest lithium deposits, for example, but to mine it wouldn’t be competitive.

A mean, a year ago, I would have said, it’s just cheaper to buy them on global markets than mine them in California. But we’ll see how broke these tariffs make us. We might all have lithium lung and be paid in company scrip again in 15 years.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Who is going to process them, though ? The problem is processing them.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Prisoners and people in RFKs health re-education camps. Just like Russia.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Rfks goauld had slave miners

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Those minerals don't just jump up from the ground even if Trump parks his fat orange ass there.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tungston and indium (at least) from those mentioned in the article. Plus graphite, rare earths, and nickle.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago