this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
314 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
3980 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 49 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)
[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

There are so many high quality rips out there. Bothering to rip these yourself makes not much sense, unless its very obscure stuff.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 43 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It's the letter of the law: media shifting is legal in some places where downloading a copy from an unofficial site is not. Also, there are people out there who would not have the first idea where to look for an existing rip.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I don't know the situation in all of the countries, but the ones I know that allow you to make a copy of what you purchased also require that in making a copy you are not allowed to break any DRM. I don't think there are many media being sold that do not include some kind of DRM these days.

Edit: agree that people may not know how to pirate stuff but ripping something in decent enough quality also requires quite specialist knowledge.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 points 21 hours ago

And a mix of available copies/qualities are better.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 9 points 17 hours ago

...unless its very obscure stuff.

That's primarily why you'd be ripping stuff. There is so much stuff only available on VHS and DVD.

[–] alcoholic_chipmunk@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Most rips tend to apply some compression. Ripping them yourself will generally give you a better result unless you also intend to compress them.

[–] TK420@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

obscure stuff.

Obi-Wan meme: That’s why I’m here

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

What about Linux? I'm a recent conver that was used to makemkv

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 4 points 14 hours ago

I'm a fan of ARM. https://github.com/automatic-ripping-machine/automatic-ripping-machine

I run it in a podman container, passing my BluRay drive though. It rips automatically, and attempts to even lookup the metadata for the disk to file it properly. It's not perfect, but it does work quite well. The only issue I have with it is it does a poor job on TV shows, but I've found nothing better, so it is good enough for me.

[–] alcoholic_chipmunk@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TK420@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I love me some MakeMKV and Linux…..sucks it’s in Russia. Oh well, thanks Mike!

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I thought I needed makemkv to put it in handbrake. Have I been doing it wrong?

Handbrake can handle DVDs directly; you'll need Make MKV for Blu-Rays.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I gave up encoding with handbrake. It looks much worse after the fact 99% of the time, no matter which settings I use.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not sure what you were trying, but this works for me:

Never use hardware encoding. That is intended for real time transcoding. There are not many settings that work since it is just sending the file to the video card and letting it do its thing.

Slower is better. If you set the software encoder to very slow it will produce an output that is very high quality per megabyte. I generally don’t care if it takes twice as long to encode it as to watch it. I queue it up and let it run over night.

Choose the right codec. I like 10 bit HEVC, because I know it will work on the clients I play it from. When you rip a DVD using MakeMKV, the video will be MPEG-2, it was designed in the 1990’s and converting the file to a modern codec will save a lot of space. I don’t reencode 4K UHD rips much since I don’t want to mess with losing the hdr or other color features that I like in watching those files.

Audio tracks: I will rip out audio for languages I don’t speak, or desctiptive audio track, but go out of my way to label things like director commentaries. I don’t reencode the audio tracks at all, you won’t save much disk space by messing with them compared to the video tracks.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 15 hours ago

Be sure to use constant quality mode too. Set the RF to around 16-18 for SD video when using x264 or x265. The lower you set it, the higher the quality is.