this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
965 points (99.4% liked)

News

26617 readers
3348 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
965
Trump to revoke legal status for 240,000 Ukrainians as US steps up deportations (www.reuters.com)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by MicroWave@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Summary

The Trump administration plans to revoke temporary legal status for 240,000 Ukrainians who fled Russia’s war, fast-tracking them for deportation.

The move is part of a broader effort to strip protections from 1.8 million migrants admitted under Biden’s humanitarian parole programs.

Trump’s policies also target 530,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.

Legal challenges are mounting, as affected individuals face uncertain futures. Advocates warn that even U.S. allies, such as Afghans who assisted the military, are now at risk of detention and deportation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] index@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Especially the ones misplaced to the US by a war Russia started, and now have to return to a war zone because the USA is now politically aligned with Russia, and willing to break international treaties, law, and ethics if it gets them Putins favor.

You’re an absolute idiot it you can’t comprehend the international seppuku the USA has just committed by failing to help displaced war refugees, and instead now helps their aggressors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_conscription_crisis

Ukraine government is drafting people by force and not allowing any male between 18-60 from leaving the country. Many people have died trying to flee the country.

"Anyone with a shred of humanity would see this as the evil bullshit it is."

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

My dude. So you understand what a war is and how it works?

Do you understand how Russia has done the same?

Do you understand how 500,000 Russians are now dead because of that?

Do you understand that those 500,000 dead Russians are invading a country they promised peace with in 1995?

Do you ultimately understand the point you are making is about how the citizens of the Ukraine are being forced by Russia to either fight for their country or die?

Because that is the policy you are defending despite it clearly being the reason there's 500,000 dead Russians and not the other way around.

If you want to decry military enlistment as "evil" then you are by far picking the worst example. Russia is far worse in their policies, with a far higher body count, and they are the reason anyone is dying at all.

Which means you are either making your arguments out of bad faith or pure stupidity.

If your argument was made in WW2 it would be about how evil the US is for defending Pearl Harbor.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My dude. So you understand what a war is and how it works?

Do you? Have you seen the footage of this war and see what's going on?

Do you understand how Russia has done the same?

Do you understand that drafting people by force like russia is doing is bad?

Do you understand how 500,000 Russians are now dead because of that?

Do you understand that bragging about 500.000 dead people is not a good thing?

Do you understand that those 500,000 dead Russians are invading a country they promised peace with in 1995?

Do you understand that a good amount of these 500.000 got drafted by force and ordered by the government to invade another country?

Do you ultimately understand the point you are making is about how the citizens of the Ukraine are being forced by Russia to either fight for their country or die?

That's not the point i'm making. Ukraine government isn't allowing any males between 18-60 from leaving the country, they are forcing them to fight or to stay there and possibly die.

Which means you are either making your arguments out of bad faith or pure stupidity.

Do you understand that by defending forced conscription and authoritarian laws you are playing russian government game too?

If your argument was made in WW2 it would be about how evil the US is for defending Pearl Harbor.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/emma-goldman-preparedness-the-road-to-universal-slaughter

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Let me explain this simply so you understand the point I am making:

What would you have Ukraine do? Slow down their conscription? Stop it entirely?

Alright, heres the game theory results on how changing their conscription rates will effect this war and it's consequences:

Outcome 1: No changes to conscription, Ukraine wins the war. Russia leaves their territory.

Result: hundreds of thousands of dead, you get to complain about how many died from conscription. Most importantly, this war doesn't reach Europe.

Because once it does, all those images of war you've seen will get much much worse, and the body count much much higher.

This is the likely outcome of all our other options.

Outcome 2: Ukraine changes their conscription laws. Less are forced to enroll to defend their country. Their population is MAGNITUDES smaller than Russias, so without the broader conscription laws, they no longer have a fighting force large enough to withstand the endless wall of North Korean and Russian meat being thrown at them.

Result 2: Russia steam rolls Ukraine. Gets a foot hold on Europe. Declares war on NATO. Starts WW3 and likely the end of peace and modern civilization as we know it. Death toll in the millions, and lots of worse war pictures for you to clutch your pearls about.

But hey, Ukraine no longer exists, so you don't have to be critical of their rough conscription laws anymore!

Outcome 3: Ukraine loses the war anyway. The above happens anyway.

Result 3: Again. No reason to be critical of their conscription laws, because they don't exist as a country now.

Sure, it would have been nice if they had a fighting force large enough to stop Russia's push into NATO and Europe. Especially considering the force that has historically stood up to this bullshit on the world stage, the US, has now broke bad and aligns with Russia.

Ukraine is not just defending themselves. They are defending the entirety of Europe and NATO, which is why there's so many emergency meetings being held to by both to help them.

Point being. Ukraine conscription is a necessary evil to prevent the worst outcome of Russias actions. If you want to be critical about death and war, then maybe understand how worse WW3 would make all of this, and how Ukrainian conscription is literally the biggest thing holding it back.

Because that's how NATO and the Ukraine see it. And that's how you should see it too. Thinking otherwise, that this isn't a very likely threat, is to ignore all the images of war you want me to look at.

Ukraine conscription is to prevent those images from being all across Europe.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you are concerned with this war reaching europe and are so favorable of forced conscription pack your bags and go to the front. You are talking about ukrainians as if they were chess pawns.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm talking about them like the heroes holding back WW3 that they are. What's your excuse?

I'm already doing my part to try and unfuck the US from aligning with Putin to pick the corpse of Europe clean when they're done with it.

If I fight in this war, it will be to take my country back from the Russian bullshit that's taken it over.

Russia is doing the same across all western countries and elections. They are in an active war with Ukraine at Europe's footsteps, and NATO is on the verge of collapse because of the US's withdrawal after aligning with Putin.

You are naive to believe Russia will stop there after weakening everything protecting Europe.

You are no different than everyone who thought Hitler would just magically stop after Poland

[–] index@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

EightBitBlood russia is not the only country in the world that spend billions in propaganda

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War_(1962%E2%80%931979)

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No shit.

Is it only the biggest spender of propaganda that makes them bad? Or is all propaganda bad? Maybe it's what propaganda does to a country that's the problem.

You know - just like how the propaganda Trump used for his US Covid response killed more Americans than anywhere else in the world. Actually, it's now killed more Americans than all the wars they've ever faught in combined.

That's the propaganda I'm fighting. Mostly because it killed friends and family.

My country is now radicalized not just into voting away their own rights, but their own lives. The dead and suffering are now ignored by the corporate controlled media, to the point where Trump was elected again despite fucking up everything he ever touched and killing over a million citizens.

Russia is now targeting Canada and Europe using these same tactics, and if those citizens are too resilient, well thankfully he's about to step over Ukraine to get there too.

But sure, let's talk about who's spending money on propaganda instead of what each kind of propaganda is doing to the world. Definitley makes for a good strawman.