43

Canada's Heritage Minister redoubled her calls for Meta to end its ban on Canadian news content on Facebook and Instagram on Saturday as thousands of Canadians continued their rush to escape wildfires ravaging British Columbia and the Northwest Territories.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I honestly don't get this thing about FB blocking news - it's because they are being forced to pay the news organisations, right? But why are they being forced to pay them - isn't it good for the news organisations to have their links appear on FB, so that people click those links, read their articles and see their ads?

I'm probably missing something, but I don't get it.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The Candian media wanted money. Thus a news link tax. (Australia tried the same thing, failed too.) But FB and Google called their bluff. Turns out FB and Google don't make money by linking to Canadian media, so they're happy to just delist those URLs.

The Canadian conservative politicians wanted the PR for attacking the evil US liberal tech giants. So they were willing to gamble, because they don't actually care about the media companies they claim to have been protecting.

Everything you wrote is true, but also traditional media is largely dying off these days. They're desperate for cash from anywhere.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks, that's interesting.

It's a shame, because I really don't like FB much, and I would consider myself a supporter of traditional news media (quality stuff at least) - but here, I just can't see how they think they have a case.

[-] diffuselight@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rupert didn’t fail. He got paid by Meta in Australia. It worked exactly as he had asked

Also .. are you ChatGPT because .. Canadas government is liberal

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You know the word "conservative" has other common meanings, right? But if you prefer, let's change it to "protectionist".

[-] diffuselight@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

We all know it means white supremacist neonazi these days

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The Canadian conservative politicians wanted the PR

Wat? This was the Liberals that put this in.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
43 points (87.7% liked)

World News

32327 readers
581 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS