648
submitted 23 hours ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 217 points 22 hours ago
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 105 points 21 hours ago

People aren't exactly gonna tell a random stranger and probable Fed that they support murder even if it's really based

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago

It's not illegal to say you believe Brian Robert Thompson deserved to die. Hell, you could, perfectly legally, file paperwork to hold a parade in Luigi's honor, right through the heart of DC. It's illegal to make death threats, but it's perfectly legal to express support for someone being killed.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago

With the incoming administration, I don't want to be on record as saying that.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Then they've already won.

Also, the executive branch does not make or enforce legislation.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

And yet... You just went on record saying it on a federated platform.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Not attached to my real name and not in an easily complied format. It's possible that lemmy is a just a big honeypot, but I doubt it.

I don't have a problem with speaking my mind in certain situations, but I'm not outing myself in some survey that counts for nothing.

[-] veniasilente@lemm.ee 4 points 17 hours ago

Why not? Feds support murder, certainly. Heck, the Constitution supports murder: it establishes an Army.

[-] Arcity@feddit.nl 1 points 12 hours ago

When they do it, not us peasants.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

I'm genuinely shocked... Maybe they didn't want to go on record saying it because they were concerned about backlash.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago

after the Nov 5th display of oligarch worshipping, maybe not as surprising it isn't higher

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago

Shit was rigged, you know they made the question something insane to get more people to not agree with the killing.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

Link to study

Do you think the actions of the killer of the United Healthcare CEO are acceptable or unacceptable?

I've seen worse phrasing for survey questions.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

O damn that's actually not worded to bad. I expected way worse than that.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Exactly. The question should have been, "did the CEO deserve to die?" It was likely, "was the killing acceptable?" It's perfectly possible to believe the bastard had it coming without thinking one person has the right to be judge, jury, and executioner.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

https://lemmy.world/comment/14023778

Apparently it was basically that, was it acceptable ot unacceptable.

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
648 points (97.8% liked)

News

23599 readers
3419 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS