The more detailed pictures will be of these type of objects(stars),
the harder it will be to ignore their large sizes
and thus theories about them.

Too many of these space objects are not behaving as they should have,
and so any crutch theories about them will be crushed.

Stars simply don't work the way we think they do.
Planetary and star formation simply doesn't work the way we currently think they do.

And the clearer the pictures are of these space objects,
the more clear it becomes that what scientists theorized
of what they thought they were looking at, just isn't it.

One of them that should have alarmed scientists,
but hasn't, is how comets suspiciously look like asteroids,
pure rock, while they should have looked very icy with
some dust sprinkled on them.
You might even say that they look the same, but are just
traveling in different orbits.
And that would explain why the Philae lander's harpoons
wasn't able to penetrate "the ice" and instead bounced back.