296
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

do evil games expect evil prizes, thank you Rainer Forst

edit: this is a pedagogical post, not a philosophical one. i actually fully agree with the paradox of tolerance and its conclusion! i just find that it doesn’t work as well as an educational tool for introducing people to the concept. sorry for any confusion :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] universalfriend@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

i really wish this was taught with emphasis at schools, so many people think hostility is inherently the best strategy when almost universally the best thing for everyone is to just cooperate.

even in nature where one would be lead to expect extreme violence and selfishness to be the best strategy, we see that most animals most of the time just.. get along.. You even have predators and prey giving each other side eye at watering holes because everyone needs to drink and thus the optimal strategy is for water in dry areas to generally be a neutral zone.

Evolution tends to favour cooperation because it's just obviously more efficient for two creatures to share resources rather than spend energy fighting over it. Why wrestle someone for an apple when you could instead spend the energy lifting them on your shoulders so they can reach the apples on a tree?

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
296 points (96.0% liked)

196

16724 readers
2115 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS