339
Monty rule problem (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by pory@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] polarbear236@sh.itjust.works 81 points 1 year ago
[-] MrSnowy@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago
[-] polarbear236@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago
[-] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Appeal to authority argument

[-] juliebean@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

you should still switch then, just switch to the door they opened. then you up your chance of killing from a mere 66% to 100%!

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Carl, that kills people

[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I’ve never understood the logic behind switching.

[-] bucho@lemmy.one 32 points 1 year ago

It might be helpful to extrapolate this out into a higher number of doors. Say there are 10 doors instead of 3, with still just the one prize. So instead of a 33% chance of getting the right answer off the bat, you have a 10% chance.

Now, after making your choice, Monty, being the good guy that he is, opens 8 of the doors that contain no prize, leaving only the door you picked, and one other closed door. Originally, your chance of getting the right door was 10%. However, that's just because you didn't know what was behind the other doors. Now, you know what was behind the other doors. Now, the number of doors that could contain the prize has shrunk from 10 to 2.

The prize is definitely behind one of the 10 doors. It could be behind the one you picked at random at the start. But that only occurs 10% of the time. 90% of the time, it's behind one of the other doors, and Monty has just shown you which of those doors it is by eliminating the other 8 possibilities. So 10% of the time, if you stick with your original choice, you're going to get a prize. But 90% of the time, you won't. So it's way better to switch when given the opportunity.

Does that make it any clearer?

[-] pory@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

What do you mean prize? This image is about not murdering your fellow humans and nothing more. This explanation only raises further questions!

[-] Pyro@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago

Thing referenced being the Monty hall problem. Old game show would have a prize and 2 goats behind doors. You pick one then, 1 of the goats were revealed. You get the option to swap your choice

[-] pory@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes I know, I posted / made the image in OP

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

So essentially like this:

Original door has 33% chance of being good, compared to 66% chance of the other 2 doors

One of other two doors are opened by Monty, because he's a swell guy!

The two doors still have a 66% chance of being good, but since one of them is now opened, that 66% chance now only applies to the one other door

Ergo there's a 66% chance that if you switch doors, you'll pick the right door

[-] eluvatar@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

This is a great explanation. I've always had a hard time explaining it but I feel like changing it from 3 to 10 makes it way more obvious.

[-] MaxMouseOCX@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You switch because new information has been added... If the host didn't reveal what was behind one of the doors, you wouldn't switch (or do, it wouldn't matter the chances are the same).

Host shows you something that removes things from the table... And that impacts the probabilities.

[-] juliebean@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

ponder on the fact that the host is not just opening one of the doors you didn't pick at random, they are specifically opening one you didn't open and that had the inferior prize. this reveals new information. if you did choose one of the two bad prizes initially (a two in three chance, right?), then the one that you can switch to must have the good prize.

[-] Sylver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

First choice: you have 1 out of 3 chances to get it right

After you pick one, they eliminate another, so the one you currently have chosen is still 33% likely while the last remaining door became 50% likely

[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which makes zero sense.

[-] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/TVq2ivVpZgQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
339 points (100.0% liked)

196

16444 readers
1722 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS