357
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 21 points 1 month ago

Now compare to autism diagnosese...

...and see no correlation.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Even if there was, I'm much happier being autistic than I would be dead.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd much prefer my children alive and autistic than dead (or debilitatingly disabled) too.

There's something weird about people who seem to think the other way around.

[-] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

You don't know that

/s?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Given that the term autism didn't exist before 1911 it probably wasn't being diagnosed a whole lot before then. But I would guess it went up as understanding and awareness of it grew, but there were definitely descriptions of people who met the criteria for it long before then.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_autism

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago

I was wondering about that as I was furiously typing out my scathing sarcastic bullshit with a shit eating grin on my face.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
357 points (99.7% liked)

science

15027 readers
178 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS