42
submitted 3 days ago by buh@hexbear.net to c/chat@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] brainw0rms@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's wild to me that libs like you can say this with a straight face after Trump has already had a term as President.

[-] StThicket@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

He will have plenty of time to alter the status quo. Isn't that what project 2025 is all about? Even if Trump denies his involvement in this project, he sure knows all people involved, and he is known to lie about everything if it benefits him.

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If he is such a threat to "democracy" why hasn't he been dealt with by the democrats either via the courts, or with a timely accident? You really need to meditate on that thought.

[-] StThicket@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

There was a republican that tried to kill him, however unsuccessfully. Other than that, there have been plenty of court cases.

But i really don't care what happenes, because I'm not voting for any of them. It would be a very interesting social experiment to see how bad it'll be. I'm welcoming the purge thay may follow.

[-] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There was a republican that tried to kill him, however unsuccessfully.

That does bring us back to their question. If Trump is going to destroy the United States government, why is it that one schizophrenic man and another republican voter take him more seriously than the entire Democrat Party?

Project 2025 is another one. Republicans have been seizing all political institutions in the US for the past 40 years or so, and the Democrats are now campaigning with Cheneys, Bushes and the like.

I think the Dems see Trump as an awesome opportunity for fundraising. That's it.

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

To add to that note, this would literally just be a “normal” neoliberal landslide election if the Dems just decided that stopping a genocide was an acceptable tradeoff to winning the election.

I can’t even believe I wrote that out, it’s so farcical and yet it’s reality. Democrats would rather lose democracy than stop committing genocide.

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

Well, not voting for either of the ghouls is something I can agree with.

[-] Moss@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

Why would he only become interested in becoming a dictator the second time he runs? He could have taken leadership of the Jan 6 shenanigans if that's what he wanted.

All he cares about is his ego, it's clear that actually running the country has no appeal to him.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
42 points (97.7% liked)

chat

8165 readers
261 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS